Term Paper on "Discourse and Frame Analysis"

Term Paper 4 pages (1264 words) Sources: 1

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Frame Analysis

It should come as no surprise that there is some blurring and overlap between definitions of discourse and frame analysis because both processes challenge the traditional type of analysis in the social sciences. Both processes are qualitative, and based in text and context, so that it is easy to confuse the two different approaches. "Cultural discourses can include frames, and some discourses can be characterized as the broadest kinds of frames. Ideologies often do the same things frames do and are sometimes called frames" (Johnston, p.63). However, while they have similarities, there are some differences between the two different types of analysis. These differences should be outlined by the researcher conducting either type of analysis, in order to avoid confusion in the reader and to make it easier to compare similar research. Moreover, in order to understand the similarities and differences between the two approaches, it is helpful to begin with a definition of each type of analysis, investigate how the analyses are conducted, and examine areas of overlap and areas of difference.

Frame analysis is a relatively new concept that only dates back to the 1950s. It was at that time that Gregory Bateson began talking about the frame as a mental construct that explains what is going on between participants in interactive situations. Like a picture frame highlights the elements in a picture, the frame around an interaction focuses attention on specific elements of the interaction while downplaying the importance of other components. The participants in these interactions use their own interpretive frameworks in order to determine how they should interpret the actions of the other people involved in their interactions. In other words, actions are not determined objectively, but subjectively, based on the perspective of the individual actors in the scenario. Frames are selective, which means that the participants will notice some activity and fail to notice other activity. Frames can help one determine what it important, at least to the participants in the action, and what is unimportant to those same participants. Therefore, while frames may not be capable of being precisely defined, frames do have several elements: content; cognitive structure; are individual and social; are fixed cognitive structures and emergent cognitive processes; and are based on text (Johnston, pp.64-66).

Discourse analysis is also based on text. "A discourse refers to the sum total of the 'manifestos, records of debates at meetings, actions of political demonstrators, newspaper articles, slogans, speeches, posters, satirical prints, statutes of associations, pamphlets, and so on' of a particular time, place and people" (Johnston, p. 67, quoting Sewell). Of course, there are multiple forms of discourses describing the same events. "To recognize more than one discourse emphasizes that what is being discussed and acted on is never unanimous but often challenged and negated by opposing groups" (Johnston, p.67). A great example of competing discourses is to read contemporary accounts of slavery by black slaves, white slaveholders, and black slave traders during the trans-Atlantic slave trade. There are different levels of discourse: world-historical discourses; organizational discourses; and the individual production of text and speech by members of movements (Johnston, p.67).

One of the significant similarities between frames and discourse analysis is that they are not only descriptive terms about social actions, but can also help define those social interactions.

For example, both of them are based on text. An example given in the text is a study of white supremacist literature. However, this literature does not only describe the belief system of white supremacists, but interacts with others in a way that changes the text of interactions. Therefore, both frames and discourse analysis recognize the very dynamic nature of describing any type of social study. Therefore, the researcher understands that the very act of framing and coding text reflects certain underlying… READ MORE

How to Reference "Discourse and Frame Analysis" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Related Term Papers:

Qualitative Frame Analysis Versus Quantitative Term Paper

Frame Analysis vs. Quantitative Frame Analysis

How does qualitative frame analysis differ from quantitative frame analysis?

Frame analysis attempts to clarify social phenomena in terms of the everyday use of… read more

Term Paper 4 pages (1315 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Sociology / Society

---

Discourse Analysis of Call Center Conversation Research Proposal

Conversation

Along the past recent decades, economic entities have suffered numerous mutations in the way they approach business partners, satisfy the customer, increase corporate profits or treat the employees. In… read more

Research Proposal 20 pages (5588 words) Sources: 20 Style: Harvard Topic: Communication / Speech

---

Social Bodies Essay

Foucault and the Current Discourse of Sexuality

The "History of Sexuality" as posited by Foucault, purportedly is an attempt to disprove the notion that westernized society has been inhibited and… read more

Essay 11 pages (3299 words) Sources: 8 Topic: Sexuality / Gender

---

John F. Kennedy Moon Speech Term Paper

The President likely considered much more than the immediate effect that his words are going to have on listeners in Houston. He probably thought about the long-term effect of his… read more

Term Paper 10 pages (3151 words) Sources: 10 Style: MLA Topic: Communication / Speech

---

Gid the Changing Discourse Term Paper

GID

The Changing Discourse on GID

The public discourse on homosexuality and gender-orientation differences is one that is in state of steady of evolution. Once treated strictly as anathema and… read more

Term Paper 4 pages (1143 words) Sources: 3 Topic: Sexuality / Gender

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>