Essay on "First Amendment and Regulated Speech"

Essay 4 pages (1275 words) Sources: 5

[EXCERPT] . . . .

First Amendment states that Congress is prohibited from passing laws that would abridge the freedom of speech. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) argues that the First Amendment does not apply to obscene material, which is defined using a three-pronged test. Obscene material is differentiated by law from indecent and profane speech. In mainstream media, this distinction is often lost.

Loewy (1993) argues that obscenity is not necessarily speech -- the term is typically applied to nudity or pornography rather than speech -- and therefore should not be entitled to First Amendment protection, echoing the FCC's position. The definition of obscenity, however, does lend itself to pornographic speech and writing. A verbal or oral description of sexual acts would satisfy all three of the prongs that define obscenity. Loewy does not address this possibility.

I feel that the First Amendment should not enjoy First Amendment protection. Loewy (1993) notes that obscenity is not covered by the First Amendment because it is not speech. This makes it more difficult to determine whether obscene speech should be treated as speech or as obscenity. Lacking further clarification from the courts, it would appear that obscene speech is more commonly regarded as obscenity, and therefore not subject to First Amendment protection. If the wording of the First Amendment were more specific in defining speech, then clearly obscenity, if so defined, would have coverage. There is no such wording with reference to obscenity, however, and the precise definition remains vague even if it is understood to lack First Amendment protection, as Antonin Scalia has noted in references to video games that ran afoul of obscenity laws (Thierer, 2008). In the interests of upholding the moral standards of society, obscenity should remain without the protection of the First Amendment (Thierer, 2008). The standards for defining obscenity should be in the hands of the people, and therefore subject to change over time, but there is no reason to include them within the realm of protected speech.

With respect to commercial language, the major issue at hand is whether the government's powers to regulate commerce gave it the power to regulate speech concerning articles of commerce (UMKC, 2012). Some changes to this view have occurred in recent decades. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy (1976) clarified some of the speech that is protected, noting that laws cannot forbid the advertising of prices, taking the view that the First Amendment protects the right to receive information as well as the right to speech (UMKC, 2012). The ruling curtailing government's ability to regulate advertising was a good first step in expanding freedom of commercial speech.

At issue with commercial speech is also the problem of content neutrality, something that is fundamental to the First Amendment. If commercial speech is exempt from First Amendment protection, then it may also be devoid of content neutrality. The average American then must learn to distinguish between commercial speech and other forms of speech, because the nature of such speech is fundamentally different. The gradual reduction in regulation of commercial speech since the 1970s is a positive step in general that brings commercial speech more in line with the First Amendment. The limitations that still exist, such as limits on false claims in advertising, are generally reasonable and constitute sufficient regulation of commercial speech.

An interesting development in the regulation of commercial speech comes in the form of Citizen's United, where the extension of First Amendment protections, specifically relating to political advertising, were extended to corporations. While an extension of the reforms that have been ongoing since Pharmacy, the Citizens United case illustrates the special position that commercial speech enjoys with respect to the First Amendment. The underlying issue in this case is the influence of business in politics, rather than the regulation of business to consumer communications. However, even Citizens United is consistent… READ MORE

How to Reference "First Amendment and Regulated Speech" Essay in a Bibliography

Related Essays:

Free Speech vs. Discrimination and Harassment Essay

Sexual Harassment and Freedom of Speech



The freedom of speech is considered, by many, to be the most fundamental freedoms. Without free speech it is impossible to… read more

Essay 4 pages (1436 words) Sources: 3 Topic: Communication / Speech

---

Speech the Central Hudson Test Origination Term Paper

Speech

The Central Hudson Test

Origination

While commercial speech typically receives limited First Amendment protection, two types of commercial speech receive no protection at all. Commercial advertising received free speech… read more

Term Paper 3 pages (910 words) Sources: 4 Topic: Advertising / Marketing / Sales

---

School's Right to Limit First Amendment Freedoms to Students Case Study

Legal Analysis

Case Summary

The high school is a publicly funded school with an inherent purpose to educate students between the ages of 14 and 18. As a result of… read more

Case Study 5 pages (1794 words) Sources: 5 Topic: Religion / God / Theology

---

1st and 2nd Amendments Term Paper

2nd Amendments

First Amendment & Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

Basically the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights reads: "Congress shall make no law" that restricts the right… read more

Term Paper 2 pages (952 words) Sources: 5 Style: APA Topic: Gun Control / Rights / 2nd Amendment

---

First Amendment Student Rights vs. School Authority Term Paper

20th century in the United States, the struggle to balance the First Amendment rights of students with the educational institutions' need to maintain a safe and orderly environment has been… read more

Term Paper 10 pages (3906 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Education / Teaching / Learning

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>