Multiple Chapters on "Assessing Financial Contributions of Sector Procurement Collaborative"

Multiple Chapters 15 pages (4955 words) Sources: 25

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Financial Contributions of Sector Procurement Collaboratives

The paradoxical nature of strategic sourcing, consortia-based procurement exchanges, and Sector Procurement Collaboratives are that from the standpoint of efficiency these buying consortia must strive to continually reduce costs and suppliers, yet on the other must remain flexible enough to respond to the needs of the customers they serve. In other words, a balance must in effect be achieved between efficiency and customer service. There are various ways in which to achieve this, as indicated by the literature.

From the customer service viewpoint, supply chain relationships have a significant effect upon both the perceived and actual effectiveness of collaborations. Generally, these relationships manifest themselves in the phenomena of trust and commitment, both of which entail elements of efficiency and customer service relationships. Indeed, Kwon and Suh (2004, p. 5) suggest that supply chain performance is directly related to the level of trust and commitment among the partners along the supply chain.

Inherent in these relationships is effective information sharing, which in turn heavily relies upon trust. The type of information to be shared will be dictated not only by supply chain necessity, but also by the level of trust and commitment as shared by supply chain partners. Only in collaboration can commitment and trust effect an optimal relationship among all partners within the supply chain.

A lack of trust in turn leads to a lack of both efficiency, velocity and cost-effectiveness within the supply chain, where scrutiny and verification will need to be increased to fill the gap created by this lack. The cornerstones of supply chain goals, namely efficiency and effectiveness, will be lost if a significant amount of trust is lost. In addition, inventory, cross-docking, collaborative forecasting, planning and replenishment will also be lost.

It follows that shared knowledge, as based upon both trust and commitment, leads to sufficient Sector Procurement Collaborative agility, as suggested by studies (Hazlett, Mcadam, Beggs, 2008). Maturation plays an important role in this regard, as mature relationships and the history of extensive collaboration in the supply chain tend to lead to a higher level of trust. (ELSamen, Chakraborty, Frankwick, 2006). It therefore appears that the literature offers considerable evidence towards the positive results to be gained from cross-functional teams, collaborative teams encompassing suppliers, and the broader strategic sourcing initiatives delivering efficiency gains (Anderson, Katz, 1998) (Talluri, Narasimhan, 2004).

On the other hand, there is a noteworthy lack of critical reflection upon the cumulative effects of knowledge sharing on transaction velocities and accuracy over time. The measurable performance gains of advanced supply chain strategies such as Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) and Collaborative Planning Forecasting & Replenishment (CPFR) (Huber, Sweeney, Smyth, 2004) nonetheless do not provide insight into increasing the agility of supply chains, or how challenges such as significant fluctuations in supplier quality levels, sourcing capacity and variations in pricing can be handled. Instead, empirical studies tend to link such advanced strategies to increased efficiency and financial results, as well as how consortia exchanges and Sector Procurement Collaboratives capitalize on process maturity delivering higher levels of inter-process accuracy and efficiency over time.

In order to achieve a closer focus on this research need, a closer attention will be paid to causation within the various phenomena that guide the supply chain management process. In other words, the causal factors behind phenomena such as commitment, satisfaction, superior performance, and the like, as well as their correlation with one another and the rest of the supply chain, will be the focus of investigation (Dant, Brown, Bagozzi, 2007, p. 2).

At the same time, it is also important to investigate the negative effects of certain phenomena within the supply chain; which also have causal bases (Dant, Brown, Bagozzi, 2007, p. 2). Trust, commitment, satisfaction and heightened performance can thus be contrasted with opportunism and dysfunctional conflict within the non-functioning supply chain relationship. By eliminating such negative factors, it is contended that a correlative positive effect and increase of desirable factors will occur, and supply chain efficiency will improve.

The purpose of this research study focuses upon two main contentions: firstly, that the efficiency of Sector Procurement Collaboratives correlates highly with inter-process maturity and transaction velocity; and secondly, it is contended that the catalysts of inter-process maturity and transaction velocity are more dependent on accumulated trust and transparency (ELSamen, Chakraborty, Frankwick, 2006) than on aggressive price and supplier reduction strategies (Devine, Dugan, Semaca, Speicher, 2001). In order to substantiate these contentions, the study intends to measure the contributory effects of inter-process accuracy and efficiency on the financial performance of a Sector Procurement Collaborative over time.

2.

Hypotheses

The hypotheses for the study emerge from the basic contentions mentioned above, and from the research questions the study seeks to address. The study focuses upon the levels of knowledge sharing and collaboration with and between suppliers, which are hypothesized to affect the probability of higher order accuracy and velocity, and the ultimate level of lean procurement workflows and lower costs resulting from this.

The first research question then addresses is the correlation of knowledge sharing (Dyer, Nobeoka, 2000) and the potential trust it creates (ELSamen, Chakraborty, Frankwick, 2006) as researched from the supplier cross-collaboration viewpoint. From this, the first hypothesis is that there is a high correlation between supply chain relationship factors such as knowledge sharing, trust, commitment and supply chain effects such as cost-effectiveness and procurement velocity.

Within this framework, more specific elements of trust, such as joint relationship effort and its effect upon mutual trust (Nyaga, Whipple and Lynch, 2009, p. 109), can be investigated. Significantly joint relationship effort results in a higher level of trust on both the parts of the buyer and supplier in the supply chain collaborative relationship. The authors make the point that a joint effort is seen as operationally focused, and thus creates an environment within which all parties concerned can demonstrate their effort for the better efficiency of operations.

Sector Procurement relationships and trust are generally built up over the long-term, which requires consistency from all parties involved. Hence, both the relatively short-term elements such as joint relationship effort and the more long-term trust elements such effective communication and knowledge sharing need to be applied in a consistent manner in order to provide a sound foundation of transaction velocity and process efficiency.

The second hypothesis is considered in conjunction with the first, and addresses the issue of communication: both inter- and intra-supplier communication influence the balance among the supply chain elements, providing, as mentioned above, a sound basis of transaction velocity while strengthening consistency and predictability. Hence the hypothesis seeks to suggest that effective knowledge sharing and communication within and among supply chain relationships will positively affect the desirable elements of the supply chain while minimizing the undesirable ones. Strong links among the elements of trust and communication will therefore be likely to also increase efficiency and velocity within the supply chain and its operations.

Biehl, Cook and Johnston (2006, p. 27) for example suggest that a match between communication mode and product customization within the supply chain correlates positively with the efficiency of joint decision making. Here, the appropriate level of communication for both routine and non-routine types of communication, where there is a high volume of decision making.

Learning and knowledge creation are also important factors within the supply chain relationship, where long-term relationships, along with the communication and trust modes inherent in these relationships, lead to a process not only of knowledge sharing, but also learning and knowledge creation. The third hypothesis is therefore that healthy, long-term relationships, where the above-mentioned elements of communication, trust and commitment are present, result in a process of learning and knowledge creation that would not have been possible without the collaboration of all parties involved (Dyer, Nobeoka, 2000). The relative level of maturity among within the supplier relationship is hypothesized to result in higher levels of collaboration over time. This increased collaboration in turn leads to the creation of synchronization across a multi-supplier federation. Furthermore, knowledge is not only shared and learned, but also created from this sharing and learning process. The supply chain in general then becomes more efficient as a result.

Johnston et al. (2003, p. 23) for example suggest that differentiation is one of the effects of this learning and knowledge creation process. This is directly related to the functioning of the supply chain as a whole. Without effective functioning across the supply chain as a whole, product differentiation cannot occur in an effective manner and the competitive edge of the company involved is lost. This relates directly back to the initial element to be investigation, which is trust. Trust leads to communication sharing, in turn creating a long-term relationship, the ultimate result of which is both learning and knowledge creation. From this level of maturity, the supply chain can create a truly competitive edge.

3.

Literature Review

Although many investigations offer insight into the supply chain from the perspective of efficiency elements such as operations velocity and cost, there is an increasing… READ MORE

How to Reference "Assessing Financial Contributions of Sector Procurement Collaborative" Multiple Chapters in a Bibliography

Related Multiple Chapterss:

International Procurement Dissertation

School of Engineering and Design

Science in [your course title goes here]

This study investigates the circumstances in which buying materials and components from foreign suppliers can offer benefits to… read more

Dissertation 56 pages (15360 words) Sources: 20 Topic: Business / Corporations / E-commerce

---

South Korean & German Trade Show Industry Dissertation

Trade Show Industry in Germany and South Korea



Trade as Marketing and Communication



Area of Study



Study Components


… read more

Dissertation 113 pages (31155 words) Sources: 105 Topic: Economics / Finance / Banking

---

Hospital Ethics Term Paper

Hospital Ethics

TO DO or NOT to DO

Abortion

Pro-life and pro-choice advocates clash over this issue, which centers on life or human life and what it really means (Oliver… read more

Term Paper 20 pages (5897 words) Sources: 2 Style: APA Topic: Abortion / Pro-Life / Pro-Choice

---

Challenges of Enterprise Resource Planning ERP Implementation Dissertation

ERP Systems

CHALLENGES of ENTERPRISE SOFTWARE IMPLEMENTATIONS

The contributions of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems continue to be problematic for many organizations globally. Continually challenged across industries to get the… read more

Dissertation 81 pages (22297 words) Sources: 50 Topic: Management / Organizations

---

Supply Chain Planning Under Uncertainty a Real Options Approach Research Proposal

Supply Chain Planning Under Uncertainty: a Real Options Approach

In a manufacturer's quest to manage its supply and demand chains, one simple word aptly portrays a certain, common, contemporary concern… read more

Research Proposal 44 pages (12190 words) Sources: 25 Style: Chicago Topic: Business / Corporations / E-commerce

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>