Term Paper on "Eusebius Church History Is a Riveting Topic"

Term Paper 5 pages (1526 words) Sources: 1+

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Eusebius

Church History is a riveting topic that has been debated for centuries. There has been a great deal of discussion concerning the accuracy of certain accounts and there validity. Amongst the most controversial accounts of church history is that of Eusebius. The purpose of this discussion is to analyze whether Eusebius's account of the history of the church is reliable or not.

Eusebius and Church History

The time of Eusebius birth is unknown but it is evident that he lived during the time of Constantine. According to the authors Schaff and Wace, Eusebius was referred to as Eusebius of Caesarea or Eusebius Pamphili by his contemporaries. The designation Eusebius of Caesarea came about because he was the Bishop of the church in Caesarea. He was also a presbyter. The time of his ordination is also unknown, however it is commonly assumed that he became presbyter while Agapius was bishop of Caesarea, and this is not unlikely, though we possess no proof of it (upon Agapius see below, H.E. VII. 32, note 39). In his Vita Constantini,. I. 19, Eusebius reports that he saw Constantine for the first time in Caesarea in the train of the Emperor Diocletian. In his Chron. Eusebius reports that Diocletian made an expedition against Egypt, which had risen in rebellion in the year 296 a.D., and Theophanes, in his Chron., says that Constantine accompanied him. It is probable therefore that it was at this time that Eusebius first saw Constantine in Caesarea, when he was either on his way to Egypt, or on his way back (Schaff and Wace)."

The other designation was derived from the fact that Eusebius was a friend of Pamphilus, who was a martyr and a presbyter of Caesarea (Schaff and Wace). Most historians believe that Eusebius was well educated in the areas of biblical science, theological science, and secular philosophy (Schaff and Wace). Historians also believe that his methods of study were greatly influenced by his instructors. One such instructor was Pamphilus who in all probability encouraged a young Eusebius to read the works of many great philosophers (Schaff and Wace).

Accuracy of Eusebius' Accounts

Understanding Eusebius history and education are essential to determining whether his account of church history was accurate. We know for certain that Eusebius was one of the most prolific writers of antiquity and church history. Historians note that although many of his writings are not as "brilliant" as other writers of his time, his writings on church history certainly contained a certain academic and historical understanding of the church (Schaff and Wace). For instance, "His exegesis is superior to that of most of his contemporaries, and his apologetics is marked by fairness of statement, breadth of treatment, and instinctive appreciation of the difference between the important and the unimportant points under discussion, which give to his apologetic works a permanent value. His wide acquaintance, too, with other systems than his own, and with the products of Pagan as well as Christian thought, enabled him to see things in their proper relations and to furnish a treatment of the great themes of Christianity adapted to the wants of those who had looked beyond the confines of a single school (Schaff and Wace)."

That is to say, that because his influences were varied in nature (both Christian and secular) he was able to make conclusions based on a more objective standpoint while simultaneously solidifying the tenants of the Christian Faith (Schaff and Wace). The accounts of church history given by Eusebius and others are not part of the cannon but provide a view of the early church nonetheless. According to Erhman these extracanonical accounts of Jesus and the disciples allow readers to garner a better understanding of the early church (Schaff and Wace).

Issues that lead some to believe that his accounts were inaccurate

One of the main issues that many historians and scholars take issue with concerning Eusebius was the manner in which he wrote. Many have described his writings as unorganized and lacking direction. Critiques argue that he took very little care in editing his work and that he was often incoherent with his thoughts. There is a belief that he actually though as he wrote. The disjointed manner in which he wrote lead some to question the accuracy of his words.

Others argue that his loyalty to the Constantinian government influenced his writings to the point of making them inaccurate. According to an article entitled "Court Theologian" Eusebius has been referred to as a good courtier, political propagandist, the great publicist of the first Christian emperor, the shrewd and worldly adviser of the Emperor Constantine, and an ecclesiastical politician. Research asserts that Eusebius was so devoted to the Constantine Empire that he risked his orthodoxy and his character. In addition, the article explains that the conventional image of Eusebius has overestimated the priority of politics in his life and writings. One obvious reason for this is his central importance as a chronicler of the Constantinian era....Eusebius's scholarly training and employment in Pamphilus's research institute in Caesarea and his later emergence as a leading churchman in the East qualified him to record this drastic transition, which he did especially in Books 8 through 10 of the Church History and in the eulogistic and biographical works on Constantine. These are the works which have traditionally drawn scholars' attention, to the relative neglect of his apologetic treatises and of his biblical exegesis. Not surprisingly, the consequence has been to think of him as permanently absorbed with the subject of the church's relation to the empire (Hollerich, 1990)."

The author also concedes that traditional disdain for church-state relations have fashioned a certain view if Eusebius and his account of Church History evident in the writings of H. Berkhof.

Berkhof wrote the only monograph on the theology of Eusebius. Others such as H.-G. Opitz believed Eusebius to be a "precocious rationalist who, rather in the fashion of the cultural Protestantism of nineteenth-century Germany, sought to ally the church with the civilizing institutions of the Roman Empire (Hollerich, 1990)." The idea that Eusebius's commitment to the Constantine Empire imposed upon his ability to present an unbiased account of church history is the main argument given concerning the accuracy of his writings (Hollerich, 1990). This notion was presented first by some of his contemporaries and later by scholars that examined his writings (Hollerich, 1990).

In more recent times scholars have come to the conclusion that Eusebius's writings a merely one man's account of church history. For instance, in his analysis of Eusebius's writing Robert M. Grant asserts that Eusebius should be viewed as "as a human being, neither a saint nor intentionally a scoundrel. Grant's analysis of the composition and themes of the Church History paid careful attention to the themes that Eusebius actually chose to write about, showing how he changed his mind on several subjects during the course of the book's composition (Hollerich, 1990)."

Esebius's account of Church history was also defended by T.D. Barnes in his book Constantine and Eusebius. Barnes analysis of the works included many of Eusebius works that had traditionally been excluded from study in times past. Barnes solidified the integrity of Eusebius's scholarship arguing that "Eusebius was perhaps fifty years old when the Battle of the Mulvian Bridge was fought, already solidly established as a scholar and an apologist, and soon to become a bishop. Scholarship and the church were the governing preoccupations of his life. Eusebius's positive attitude toward the empire and human history thus took shape long before Constantine entered the scene and reflected a widespread optimism in the Greek East in the half century before the Great Persecution (Hollerich, 1990)."

In addition, Barnes and other modern scholars argue that Eusebius probably had very little contact with Constantine. They further argue that… READ MORE

How to Reference "Eusebius Church History Is a Riveting Topic" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Related Term Papers:

Church History Essay

Church History

The History of the Church

Intended Audience: A mixed group of high school and junior high school students with a background in the Christian Faith

Time Frame: One… read more

Essay 2 pages (663 words) Sources: 6 Topic: Religion / God / Theology

---

Church History the Inheritance of Generations Essay

Church History

The Inheritance of Generations: The Papacy, Protestantism, and Progress within the Church

Throughout the majority of its existence, the Roman Catholic Church was a far more politically potent… read more

Essay 4 pages (1121 words) Sources: 3 Style: MLA Topic: Religion / God / Theology

---

Church History the Birth of Protestantism Research Paper

Church History

The birth of Protestantism, often traced to Luther's nailing of his ninety-five theses on a church door, is more accurately attributed to Luther's refusal to recant a host… read more

Research Paper 2 pages (572 words) Sources: 1 Style: MLA Topic: Religion / God / Theology

---

History in the 19th Century Essay

History In the 19th Century:

It's impossible to understand the course of the United States in the 19th Century without understanding the cause and consequences of the Civil War. The… read more

Essay 3 pages (997 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: American History / United States

---

History of Rosicrucian Order Thesis

History Of the Rosicrucian Order

Despite being one of the oldest esoteric societies, the Rosicrucian Order remains one of the most mysterious and least well-known of the various groups that… read more

Thesis 21 pages (5816 words) Sources: 21 Topic: Literature / Poetry

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>