Research Paper on "Ethics Surrounding Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research"

Research Paper 14 pages (5907 words) Sources: 20

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Ethics Surrounding Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research

Since their discovery in the early 1990's, Stem Cells have brought with them the promise of evolutionary and significant scientific and medical research and opportunities that possessed the possibility of radically improving treatments for a host of diseases such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, various cancers and other diseases that currently render patients and scientists helpless to combat. Stem Cells have been at the center of the scientific research paradigm in terms of developing innovative treatments that could revolutionize the current course of medical care (Bellomo, 2006)

With the advent of medical and scientific research comes the inevitable emergence of the controversy that has accompanied every major scientific and medical advancement. The use of Stem Cells is no different. Those who seek to curtail the use of certain stem cell lines, revert to the argument that has defined many medical centric debates over the previous decades. This argument, the destruction of human life to create life, is the stalwart philosophical point that all anti-stem cell advocates attempt to make. These individuals equate the use of stem cells as akin to murder, the same vantage point that the anti-abortion interest groups use to persuade others the process is the taking of innocent human life (Bevington, 2002)

Conversely, those who purport the use of stem cells often find themselves in concert scientific evidence that demonstrates how potent stem cells are in terms of treating previously untreatable diseases. Humans, for the most part, seek to minimize pain and maximize pleasure. This dichotomy can be expressed i
Continue scrolling to

download full paper
n medical terms as well. Individuals are willing to involve themselves in various treatments that can prolong their lives or possibly reverse their condition. To this end, public opinion generally comes down in favor of stem cell research.

For all of the in-depth scientific arguments, citations to study after study indicating how effective stem cells are at improving patient well being, the entire argument over the correct use of stem cells in scientific research comes down to a moral-philosophical-religious connotation that has perplexed the minds of theologians and philosophers since the dawn of time "When does life begin"? The answer to this question will ultimately define this debate and conclusively provide the closure and resolution both sides have been searching for. However, this answer has yet to be determined, either from a purely religious or scientific perspective. Until this question is answered, the greatest extent possible, then the debate over the proper use of stem cells is destined to continue in its veracity.

The purpose of this discussion is to engage in an analysis of the various aspects of the ethical debate concerning the use of stem cells in medical research. This issue is not as simple as right vs. wrong and black vs. right, rather; there are complexities involving human suffering balanced to the taking of a human life that is in the form of an embryo. Implicit in this debate is a myriad of philosophical, ethical, scientific and religious logical constructs that integrate themselves into this debate which makes the debate over usage of stem cells one of the hottest debates currently produced in modern society.

This discussion will introduce this debate by outlining the science underlying stem cells. Furthermore, the various types of stem cells will be discussed along with the general concepts of biochemistry, biology and other chemical properties of these cells will be examined in order to provide a working construct that serves to frame the debate and provide a context in order to understand the nature of stem cells and how effective they are. In addition to the scientific discourse, the philosophical undertones of this debate from a wide variety of philosophical maxims inherently contained in it them will be analyzed within the framework of the stem cell debate.

Lastly, this discussion will conclude with an overall review of the main tenants of the ethical, moral, religious aspects of this debate. This essay will not judge the prongs of each approach to the ethical ramifications of stem cells in medical research.

Scientific Premise of Stem Cells

Stem cells are akin to "blank slates" in terms of their genetic development and principles. Stem cells possess two unique qualities that separate them from other cells in the human body (Carrier, 2004) First, Stem Cells are undifferentiated at their outset, this means that a stem cell has the ability to develop into any cell type in the body. A stem cell can be produced in the red bone marrow and then be placed into a pietri dish with cardiac cells (Cohen, 2007). Eventually, the stem cell will adapt the properties of those surrounding cardiac cells and develop into another cardiac cell-taking with it all the qualities and characteristics of the cardiac cell they are introduced to.

This differentiation principle allows stem cells to repair damaged tissues and organ systems (Wobus, 2008_. There have been many studies that demonstrate infusion of stem cells into damaged muscle tissue following trauma can increase the likelihood of a patient having a positive recovery, minimizing damage to internal organs or tissues. This principle is highly valuable to scientists seeking to harness this differentiation principle to direct stem cells in their quest to cure certain diseases (Wobus, 2008).

There are two distinct types of stem cells that researchers have used. Embryonic and Adult. The more potent stem cell lines that are used in medical research are derived from frozen human embryos, these Human Embryonic Stem Cells possess the greatest capacity to develop and foster immense possibilities in dealing with diseases. These stem cells are derived from those embryos that have been frozen and are waiting for fertilization from a male gamete. However, there are some instances in which these embryonic stem cells are not fertilized, therefore they are set to be discarded. Rather than have these embryos destroyed, they are used for scientific research to harvest their DNA and used in clinical treatments or academic research to investigate the impact of certain proposed treatments.

In recent years, scientists have been able to identify highly specialized conditions that allow a cell to be "reprogrammed" and revert back to its stem cell state; allowing it to exhibit the main principles of a stem cell-differentiation and tissue repair. These cells are referred to as "Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells" or (IPSC's) (Wobus, 2008). All three categories of stem cells: embryonic, adult and IPSC all posses the potential to radically alter the course of modern medicine and unlock the full impact of cell-based regenerative therapies to treat diseases such as diabetes, myocardial infarctions along with Alzheimer's and Parkinson's. Despite the inherent similarities between these various cell lines, there are differences that must be addressed.

The first difference is that each cell line inherently contains various levels of differentiation abilities. For example, Human Embryonic Stem Cells (hESC's) posses the highest level of differentiated ability in that they can be programmed to form any type of cell in the human body. Adult stem cells exhibit a more limited capacity for differentiation. Adult stem cells are limited to differentiating into additional cells from their tissue of origin. Specifically, an adult stem cell from a calf muscle cannot be introduced into the spinal column in order to regenerate damaged nerve tissue. Another critical difference between the two cell lines involves their generation.

Embryonic stem cells are more readily produced in culture. Adult stem cells, in contrast, are rarely found in mature tissue, therefore the process of isolating these cells is increasingly difficult. A related distinction is the ability of tissues derived from these cell lines to be rejected after transplantation. Currently, there is little data involving the tissues derived from Human Embryonic Stem Cells given the Food and Drug Administration has only recently given approval to allow human testing in Phase-1 clinical trials that involve transplanting tissues generated from Human Embryonic Stem Cells. Conversely, there is ample data to suggest that those tissues created from Adult stem cells are less likely to be rejected during transplantation. The science behind this principle is relatively straightforward; the patient's own cells are utilized in creating this newly formed tissue, therefore the incidents rates and probability of the patient's own T-Cells and B-Cells creating a histological reaction to "self" is increasingly unlikely.

IPSC's or "Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells" are the latest stem cells to be developed by research scientists. As defined earlier, these stem cells are not an individual stem cell line, like Embryonic or Adult, the are more akin to a "sub-division." These are cells that have been genetically reprogrammed through a variety of recombinant DNA and RNA technologies that have allowed these cells to revert to their stem cell phase, hence the word "Induced"- these cells are "induced" into becoming stem cells. Two types of IPSC's were developed, mice (2006) and humans (2007). Each of these cell lines exhibited qualities important to the foundation of pluripotent stem cells. Bot mouse and human IPSC's were able to form tumor necrosing cells, exhibit numerous cell markers and differentiate into… READ MORE

Quoted Instructions for "Ethics Surrounding Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research" Assignment:

This paper must have an abstract. I have also included the Bibliography which must be used and cited in this paper. The Bibliography is below. Please let me know if you have any questions.

*****¢ Bellomo, Michael. The Stem Cell Divide: The Facts, the Fiction, and the Fear Driving the Greatest Scientific, Political, and Religious Debate of Our Time. New York: AMACOM, 2006.

*****¢ Bevington, Linda K., Ray G. Bohlin, Gary P. Stewart, John F. Kilner, and C. Christopher Hook. Basic Questions on Genetics, Stem Cell Research and Cloning: Are These Technologies Okay to Use? Grand Rapids: Kregel, 2002.

*****¢ Carrier, Ewa, and Gracy Ledingham. 100 Questions & Answers about Bone Marrow and Stem Cell Transplantation. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett, 2004.

*****¢ Cohen, Cynthia B. Renewing the Stuff of Life: Stem Cells, Ethics, and Public Policy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.

*****¢ DeGette, Diana. Sex, Science, and Stem Cells: Inside the Right Wing Assault on Reason. Guilford, CT: Lyons, 2008.

*****¢ Fox, Cynthia. Cell of Cells: The Global Race to Capture and Control the Stem Cell. New York: W.W. Norton, 2007.

*****¢ Friedman, Lauri S., and Hal Marcovitz. Is Stem Cell Research Necessary? Referencepoint Press, 2009.

*****¢ Green, Ronald M. The Human Embryo Research Debates: Bioethics in the Vortex of Controversy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.

*****¢ Gruen, Lori, Laura Grabel, and Peter Singer, eds. Stem Cell Research: The Ethical Issues. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 2007.

*****¢ Herold, Eve, and George Daley. Stem Cell Wars: Inside Stories from the Frontlines. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.

*****¢ Holland, Suzanne, Karen Lebacqz, and Laurie Zoloth, eds. The Human Embryonic Stem Cell Debate: Science, Ethics, and Public Policy . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001.

*****¢ Humber, James M., and Robert F. Almeder. Stem Cell Research. Totowa, NJ: Humana, 2004.

*****¢ Juengst, Eric, and Michael Fossel. *****The Ethics of Embryonic Stem Cells: Now and Forever, Cells Without End.***** JAMA 284 (2000): 3180-3184.

*****¢ Kass, Leon R. Life, Liberty, and the Defense of Dignity: The Challenge for Bioethics. San Francisco: Encounter, 2002.

*****¢ Korobkin, Russell, and Stephen R. Munzer. Stem Cell Century: Law and Policy for a Breakthrough Technology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2009.

*****¢ Lanza, Robert, Roger Pedersen, Douglas Melton, John Gaerhart, E. Donnall Thomas, James A. Thomson, and Brigid Hogan, eds. Essentials of Stem Cell Biology. Burlington, MA: Academic, 2005.

*****¢ Marzilli, Alan. Stem Cell Research and Cloning. New York: ***** House, 2007.

*****¢ Monroe, Kristen Renwick, Ronald Miller, and Jerome Tobis, eds. Fundamentals of the Stem Cell Debate: The Scientific, Religious, Ethical, and Political Issues. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007.

*****¢ Mulkay, Michael. The Embryo Research Debate: Science and the Politics of Reproduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

*****¢ National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Vol. 1 of Ethical Issues in Human Stem Cell Research. Rockville, MD: NBAC, 1999. http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/nbac/stemcell.pdf (Accessed June 24, 2010).

*****¢ __________. Commissioned Papers. Vol. 2 of Ethical Issues in Human Stem Cell Research. Rockville, MD: NBAC, 2000. http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/nbac/stemcell2.pdf (Accessed June 24, 2010).

*****¢ __________. Religious Perspectives. Vol. 3 of Ethical Issues in Human Stem Cell Research. Rockville, MD: NBAC, 2000. http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/nbac/stemcell3.pdf (Accessed June 24, 2010).

*****¢ Østnor, Lars, ed. Stem Cells, Human Embryos and Ethics: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. New York: Springer, 2008.

*****¢ Panno, Joseph. Stem Cell Research: Medical Applications and Ethical Controversy. New York: Checkmark, 2006.

*****¢ Peters, Ted. Sacred Cells? Why Christians Should Support Stem Cell Research. Rowman & Littlefield, 2010.

*****¢ Peters, Ted. The Stem Cell Debate. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2007.

*****¢ Potten, Christopher S., Robert B. Clarke, James Wilson, and Andrew G. Renehen, eds. Tissue Stem Cells. New York: Informa Healthcare, 2006.

*****¢ Prentice, ***** A. Stem Cells and Cloning. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings, 2008.

*****¢ The President*****'s Council on Bioethics.Human Cloning and Human Dignity: The Report of the President*****'s Council on Bioethics. New York: Public Affairs, 2002. http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/pdbe/reports/cloningreport/pcbe_cloning_... (accessedJune 24, 2010).

*****¢ Robertson, John A. *****Science and Society: Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research: Ethical and Legal Issues.***** Nature Reviews Genetics 2 (2002): 74-78.

*****¢ Ruse, Michael, and Christopher A. Pynes, eds. The Stem Cell Controversy: Debating the Issues. Amherst, NY: Prometheus, 2003.

*****¢ Shostak, Stanley. Becoming Immortal: Combining Cloning and Stem-cell Therapy. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002.

*****¢ Snow, Nancy E., ed. Stem Cell Research: New Frontiers in Science and Ethics. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2003.

*****¢ Waters, Brent, and Ronald Cole-Turner, eds. God and the Embryo: Religious Voices on Stem Cells and Cloning. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2003.

*****¢ Wertz, Dorothy C. *****Embryo and Stem Cell Research in the USA: A Political History.***** Trends in Molecular Medicine 8 (2002): 143-146.

Additional Key Reports on Stem Cell Research

*****¢ Chapman, Audrey R., Mark S. Frankel, and Michele S. Garfinkel. *****Stem Cell Research and Applications: Monitoring the Frontiers of Biomedical Research.***** AAAS / ICS, November 1999. http://www.aaas.org/spp/sfrl/projects/stem/report.pdf (Accessed June 24, 2010).*****¨

*****¢ Committee on the Biological and Biomedical Applications of Stem Cell Research, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council, Board on Neuroscience and Behavioral Health, Institute of Medicine. Stem Cells and the Future of Regenerative Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academies, 2002. Available online at www.nap.edu/books/0309076307/html/ (Accessed June 24, 2010).*****¨

National Academies. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP) and Board on Life Sciences (BLS). Scientific and Medical Aspects of Human Reproductive Cloning. Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy; National Academy of Sciences; National Academy of Engineering; Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy, 2002. Available online at http://www.nap.edu/books/0309076374/html/ (Accessed June 24, 2010).

How to Reference "Ethics Surrounding Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research" Research Paper in a Bibliography

Ethics Surrounding Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2010, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/ethics-surrounding-human-embryonic/1105207. Accessed 3 Jul 2024.

Ethics Surrounding Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research (2010). Retrieved from https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/ethics-surrounding-human-embryonic/1105207
A1-TermPaper.com. (2010). Ethics Surrounding Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research. [online] Available at: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/ethics-surrounding-human-embryonic/1105207 [Accessed 3 Jul, 2024].
”Ethics Surrounding Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research” 2010. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/ethics-surrounding-human-embryonic/1105207.
”Ethics Surrounding Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research” A1-TermPaper.com, Last modified 2024. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/ethics-surrounding-human-embryonic/1105207.
[1] ”Ethics Surrounding Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research”, A1-TermPaper.com, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/ethics-surrounding-human-embryonic/1105207. [Accessed: 3-Jul-2024].
1. Ethics Surrounding Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research [Internet]. A1-TermPaper.com. 2010 [cited 3 July 2024]. Available from: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/ethics-surrounding-human-embryonic/1105207
1. Ethics Surrounding Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/ethics-surrounding-human-embryonic/1105207. Published 2010. Accessed July 3, 2024.

Related Research Papers:

Stem Cell Research -- Ethical Issues Term Paper

Paper Icon

Stem Cell Research -- Ethical Issues

The positive, progressive view of stem cell research raises the promise of one day helping to heal individuals with diseases like Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, spinal… read more

Term Paper 9 pages (2928 words) Sources: 5 Topic: Abortion / Pro-Life / Pro-Choice


Human Embryonic Stem Cells Thesis

Paper Icon

Human Embryonic Stem Cells

Stem cell studies are on the very cutting edge of biological advancement and research. These undifferentiated cells have the potential to become any cell in the… read more

Thesis 8 pages (2522 words) Sources: 8 Style: MLA Topic: Genetics / DNA / Genes / Heredity


Stem Cell Research the Issue of Federal Essay

Paper Icon

Stem Cell Research

The issue of federal funding for embryos stem cell research is one of the most contentious and painful topics in the area of public health, because the… read more

Essay 5 pages (1684 words) Sources: 5 Topic: Aging / Death / Gerontology


Stem Cell Research Has Been Controversial Term Paper

Paper Icon

stem cell research has been controversial for years. What are stem cells and why do they entail so much interest? In Principles of Regenerative Medicine, Ahsan declares that "Stem cells… read more

Term Paper 2 pages (899 words) Sources: 2 Topic: Ethics / Morality


Stem Cell Research Embryonic Term Paper

Paper Icon

Stem Cell Research

Embryonic stem cell research has the potential to help more than 100 million Americans who have life-threatening diseases and conditions such as cancer, heart disease, diabetes, Parkinson's,… read more

Term Paper 3 pages (1159 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Disease / Virus / Disorder / Injury


Wed, Jul 3, 2024

If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!

Established in 1995
900,000 Orders Finished
100% Guaranteed Work
300 Words Per Page
Simple Ordering
100% Private & Secure

We can write a new, 100% unique paper!

Search Papers

Navigation

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!