Term Paper on "Enron Corporation Scandal"

Term Paper 10 pages (2869 words) Sources: 10

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Enron Scandal: A Security Professional's Analysis

The Enron Corporation's behavior was both unethical and illegal. In some instances, the company had members of Congress as well as members of its own board of directors helping to politically influence the U.S. regulatory laws and landscape in order to create an Enron-run commodities market. The failure to both see and expose Enron's misdeeds was systemic, and each level of responsibility and oversight was violated in a different manner. The company itself lacked the internal ethical structure to prevent such dealings and the culture of corruption that existed at Enron was so pervasive that employees helped aid and abet the very individuals who eventually brought the company to its knees. Enron contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to political campaigns in Texas in order to secure the votes and politicians necessary to carry out its actions with little to no scrutiny from regulators.

The U.S. government was involved in the Enron scandal, namely then Texas Senator Graham and his wife as well as Vice President Dick Cheney. Former Texas Senator Phil Graham served while Enron began its rise to power in the 1990's and early 2000's (NewsMax, 2002). Graham actually voted to help allow Enron to operate as a relatively unregulated commodities broker. This laid the groundwork for Enron's ability to corner the energy market while failing to report the losses of hundreds of millions of dollars from other means (What Really Happened, 2002). Graham's wife, Wendy, served on the Enron board of directors, in what could be viewed as a severe conflict of interest. In a way, Enron's influence in Congress was powerful enough to alter the r
Continue scrolling to

download full paper
egulatory and political landscapes in their favor.

Beyond the specific involvement of Mr. And Mrs. Graham, the U.S. Government was unable to detect the unethical and, in many cases, illegal actions of Enron through the commodities market it had control over. The California power shortage as well as other examples of Enron exerting monopolistic control over certain markets and commodities should have tipped the SEC and other regulatory groups off to what was going on behind closed doors at Enron.

The impact on the United States and its citizens was profound. Without a doubt, the fall of Enron sparked new interest in matters of corporate and political corruption as well as outrage in many of the markets that Enron was manipulating and fleecing. After the Enron scandal, the U.S. regulations relative to corporate and fiscal oversight changed. The Sarbannes-Oxley Act was passed as an answer to the problems and issues posed by the Enron debacle (UC College Law, 2004). The act itself is a point by point solution to the problems with the regulatory system that were first exposed through the unethical actions of the company and its senior officers.

Beyond the regulatory impact, U.S. citizens became weary of the potentially toxic mixture of politics and regulatory framework, in the presence of large sums of money. This is to say that the American public was weary of Congressional oversight; given the fact that Phil Graham had fought for Enron's ability to corner the energy commodities market in many states.

Part 2

In order to fully understand the Enron scandal, it is necessary to more closely examine the timeline of events as it occurred, and how a security professional might intervene.

In 1985, Enron's senior officer, Kenneth Lay gained control of the companies that would later form Enron and their commodities trading network. One of Enron's CEO's of finance, Jeff Skilling, joins the company in 1990 after leaving a failed bank, which interestingly enough was dissolved by the FDIC for insolvency (What Really Happened, 2002). As a security professional, it is necessary to investigate the past dealings of all future employees in order to ascertain whether or not these individuals meet the ethical standards of the company. If Skilling had been adequately investigated, perhaps he would not have been brought on to Enron.

Skilling later hires Andrew Fastow to work under him and Lay. This is prior to Enron's first electricity trade in the commodities market, which occurred in 1994. In 1996, Fastow makes up many off-book companies and entities which Enron uses to make business deals with. These companies absorb Enron's debt and losses, and since they are off-book, Enron is able to report profits to its shareholders the security professionals overseeing Fastow's operations in these matters should have been privy to the dealings of these shell companies. Certainly Fastow was not the only person in the company with information relative to why these shell entities were in existence.

Later in 1996, Skilling becomes Enron's COO and President. In 1997, Fastow makes a mistake in creating Chewco, a company that is designed to absorb Enron losses. However, unlike the other shell companies that Fastow created previously, Chewco does not meet the regulatory requirements to keep it off of the official Enron books and balance sheet. This is the beginning of the end for Enron, and a serious misstep for Fastow, who had created dozens of shell companies in order to hide Enron's debt. Since Chewco did not meet the regulatory requirements, it should have been readily apparent to the security officers as well as the regulatory agencies to see that Fastow, as well as the entire company, were engaging in less than ethical business behavior. However, going after Fastow at this juncture could have proven quite difficult, given the fact that Fastow was hired by Skilling.

Another egregious error that was perpetrated by the Enron board of directors, including Phil Graham's wife, was overlooking and waiving the internal moratorium on Fastow being able to work for both Enron and the companies he was creating to absorb Enron's debt. Fastow creates LJM Incorporated, which is a clearinghouse for buying Enron's debt (What Really Happened, 2002). As a security specialist, the board of director's decision to allow Fastow to continually violate both internal ethics regulations as well as federal financial regulations represents an excellent opportunity to arrest the downward spiral that Enron was beginning to follow. A security professional should have internally investigated this board of director's decision as well as the implications that the decision had on Enron's operations. This represents a serious conflict of interest. The same year, 1999, Enron announces its internet-based trading platform that gives traders the ability to buy and sell energy commodities online (NewsMax, 2002). Enron makes millions from this platform all the while manipulating the markets.

In early 2000, after much of the damage had been done to Enron's books, Skilling and Lay both try to cover up their losses as well as the existence of the fraudulent shell companies created by Fastow by filing fraudulent tax returns as well as submitting fraudulent letters to Arthur Andersen, Enron's accounting firm (Open Secrets, 2002). In this same year, Enron releases a 64-page code of ethics, which is later identified as a way to help insulate the culture of corruption by training its employees to overlook certain red flags. As a security specialist, it would be impossible to not see that Enron's issuing of a highly-suspect, 64-page ethics booklet as an indicator of other fraudulent dealings by the company (What Really Happened, 2002). The security and ethics team should not have caved to the upper level management's desire to create this culture, and should have been privy to the fact that these same executives were looking to cover up their tax and accounting information. After all of this fraudulent activity, Enron begins selling shares to the public in this same year, helping to raise more money to cover the company's losses and placing the onus of the losses into the public sector. Enron begins to monopolize the energy markets, specifically in California. This draws the attention of California Governor Gray Davis as well as unwanted media attention.

In early 2001, Enron engineers a rolling blackout in California, further jacking up energy demand and prices. It is not discovered until later that this blackout was artificially engineered by Enron to help increase their profits, since the California energy market had been firmly cornered by Enron in the years prior. In the same year, Skilling lies to shareholders by understating the amount of debt that Enron has built up. As a security professional, it would be prudent to make sure that the public relations department as well as executives like Skilling is honest in their dealings with the public. This dishonesty is a symptom of the corporate culture of corruption at Enron. Arthur Andersen, with the approval of Skilling and other Enron executives, lies to the public about the huge debt and accounting errors that Enron has on its book (NewsMax, 2002). This further exacerbates the share holders' issues and claims later down the road. Again, as a security specialist, it is necessary to make sure that the company's public relations team and messages are congruent with the facts, as they were not in the case of Enron.

In 2000, Skilling and… READ MORE

Quoted Instructions for "Enron Corporation Scandal" Assignment:

Project 2 (Two Parts)

When you complete this project, you should address the various questions posed in both parts 1 and 2. Your responses should be well thought out, well researched, detailed, and comprehensive. Your project should be no shorter than 6 to 8 pages in length with standard one-inch margins, and it should indicate the sources and references you researched and their findings. Your project should include an introduction, a body, and conclusions. Use the references and information contained in the application and case study section in module 2 to assist you.

Part 1

Analyze the Enron Corporation scandal. Use various Web search engines (e.g., Google and Ask Jeeves) and review the information and various documents that are available concerning the Enron Corporation scandal. Analyze what was done and by whom, what was unethical, and what was illegal.

How was the U.S. government, including members of the administration and Congress, involved?

What was the actual impact on the United States of America and its citizens?

Part 2

If Enron*****'s senior security professional was aware of what was happening, what steps should he or she have taken to bring the situation to the attention of the proper authorities, including the board of directors, law enforcement, shareholders, and the appropriate government officials?

If you were the senior security professional at Enron and were privy to what was taking place, what would you have done and whom would you have notified? What might have prevented you from reporting the situation to the proper authorities and the shareholders?

*****

How to Reference "Enron Corporation Scandal" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Enron Corporation Scandal.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2011, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/enron-scandal-security-professional/879056. Accessed 3 Jul 2024.

Enron Corporation Scandal (2011). Retrieved from https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/enron-scandal-security-professional/879056
A1-TermPaper.com. (2011). Enron Corporation Scandal. [online] Available at: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/enron-scandal-security-professional/879056 [Accessed 3 Jul, 2024].
”Enron Corporation Scandal” 2011. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/enron-scandal-security-professional/879056.
”Enron Corporation Scandal” A1-TermPaper.com, Last modified 2024. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/enron-scandal-security-professional/879056.
[1] ”Enron Corporation Scandal”, A1-TermPaper.com, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/enron-scandal-security-professional/879056. [Accessed: 3-Jul-2024].
1. Enron Corporation Scandal [Internet]. A1-TermPaper.com. 2011 [cited 3 July 2024]. Available from: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/enron-scandal-security-professional/879056
1. Enron Corporation Scandal. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/enron-scandal-security-professional/879056. Published 2011. Accessed July 3, 2024.

Related Term Papers:

Segregation of Duty the Enron Research Paper

Paper Icon

Moral responsibility for the collapse of ENRON

Individuals' Angle

Because corporate principles stem from actions and choices of human persons, these individuals ought to be seen as the principal bearers… read more

Research Paper 8 pages (2524 words) Sources: 8 Topic: Accounting / Auditing


Enron Dubbed Term Paper

Paper Icon

Enron

Dubbed as one of the most celebrated cases in contemporary business cataclysm in the U.S., the scandal shadowing the collapse of Enron have brought forth economic devastation to the… read more

Term Paper 15 pages (4381 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Business / Corporations / E-commerce


Enron's Misleading Accounting & Fraud Tactics Thesis

Paper Icon

Enron was the seventh-largest corporation in the world. Enron Company was divided into five distinct parts including; Wholesale Services, Transportation and Distribution, Broadband Services, Retail Energy Services, and Corporate and… read more

Thesis 98 pages (27112 words) Sources: 20 Topic: Business / Corporations / E-commerce


Ethics and Social Responsibility Term Paper

Paper Icon

Enron Corporation and the American Fur Company

To construct a comparison between Enron and American Fur, it is useful to ask some questions. Were the executives at Enron more unethical… read more

Term Paper 2 pages (935 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Business / Corporations / E-commerce


Enron's Collapse What Brought About Enron's Collapse? Term Paper

Paper Icon

Enron's Collapse

What Brought About Enron's Collapse?

Enron Corporation was the seventh-largest company on the Fortune 500 list of the largest companies in the United States in 2000; it had… read more

Term Paper 4 pages (1254 words) Sources: 0 Topic: Business / Corporations / E-commerce


Wed, Jul 3, 2024

If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!

Established in 1995
900,000 Orders Finished
100% Guaranteed Work
300 Words Per Page
Simple Ordering
100% Private & Secure

We can write a new, 100% unique paper!

Search Papers

Navigation

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!