Essay on "Employee Retention"

Essay 5 pages (1635 words) Sources: 4

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Employee retention is usually defined as an organized effort by the employer to generate and encourage a working situation that assists its current employees to remain with the organization by providing policy and practices that fit employees' different needs. Loss of an employee can cost a company one to two times that employee's annual salary. It can also lead to loss of morale, lost customers, and significant lost time spent accomplishing all of these rehiring activities. And there is a possibility that the replacement may not be a satisfactory employee.

Past and Present

Consider that during the 1950's, employee tenure averaged 23+ years, and in the 1990's, that figure had dropped to 4+ years. The major reason people leave jobs today is not money, but rather their relationship and unhappiness with their immediate supervisor. That translates to a lack of communication, or trust, or fairness, or, more often than not, the perceived (or real) lack of appreciation of the employee's efforts and accomplishments. Fifty years ago, a pat on the back was not as important as bread on the table. Priorities have changed over time.

In the 1950's, 60% of the workforce was unskilled vs. 15% in the year 2000. If fair pay for a fair day's work was part of the bargain, the more unskilled workforce remained somewhat content with their situation. Today, with four times as many skilled workers, management is more complex; workers have to be trained and then retrained as technology changes; and knowledge and abilities must be topnotch to be competitive (Employee Retention).

The term "employee retention" didn't really appear on the business scene until the 1970's and early 1980's. During this time period, job mobility and voluntary job changes became more prevalent, and not looked down upon as an aberration. The 1950's model of lifelong tenure faded into the past as employers had a whole new phenomenon to worry about -- employee turnover. And, employers responded to this with a new management tool -- employee retention.

During the early phases of this newly developing mobile workforce, management's response was to ask what they could do to stop employees from leaving their workforce. The power, for many decades, had been with management, so, at first, it was an assumption that there was something they could do to put a stop to this nonsense. But, they didn't realize or didn't want to understand that society was changing; there was not one simple cause of this employee turnover.

And, emphatically, the most significant event they could not grasp was that the power was shifting from management to employee. Try as they might, nothing could return them to the old, "paternalistic" pattern of status-quo. They realized they were actually going to have to do something to respond to this societal change (McKeown, 2002).

First, employers attacked the known entities such as compensation, benefits, and the physical environment (health and safety, bathroom breaks, etc.) -- the easy-to-see, easy-to-fix stuff that their "old" paternalistic thinking focused on. They were set on fixing those basic things that caused employee dissatisfaction, but were not ready to imagine that they had to go beyond that to policies and procedures that caused employees to "want" to stay.

By the mid to late 1980s, the realization struck that "higher" needs must be met in order to retain employees. Enter, Abraham Maslow and his hierarchy of needs. Maaslow, considered the founder of humanistic psychology during the mid-1900s, declared a pyramid of needs that all humans experience. The most basic level is food, water, oxygen to breathe, etc. The next level is safety and security, then the social needs of belonging, friendship, and love. Above that are ego needs such as respect, esteem and recognition, and the top level contains such needs as self-actualization, fulfillment, and self-development -- each level attained in order (McKeown, 2002).

By the 1980's this hierarchy had become widely accepted in many aspects of society, and became the watchword of a newly developing phenomenon called "human resources" (HR) in business. The implications for a real process of retaining employees were huge.

If we stop and look back at the past 20 years of HR, we can see in Maslow's hierarchy all the things that employees have been asking their employers for and that management has been responding with to achieve a successful program of employee retention. Maslow's need for acceptance has been met by employer's offering orientation programs and events like company retreats; suggestion programs, diversity programs, and corporate visions and values have been offered to attempt to meet an employee's need for respect; need for status met with job titles, executive perks, corner offices, and authority to delegate; and, finally, management is offering lifelong learning programs, funded education programs and sabbaticals to meet the employee's needs for fulfillment and self-development (McKeown, 2002).

Today, as mentioned before, employees leave supervisors and managers -- usually much more often than they leave companies. The quality of supervision and the level to which Maslow's hierarchy of needs is met between supervisor and employee, is critical to any employee retention program. And in a quality-managed company, that knowledge comes from the top down. If the CEO and management team are not emphasizing this key factor, then it will not happen and any attempt at programs, policies, and procedures will fail.

Employees leave supervisors who do not: provide clarity about expectations, provide clarity about career development and earning potential, give regular feedback about performance, hold scheduled meetings, and provide a framework within which the employee perceives that he or she can succeed (Heathfield, n.d.).

But more needs to be said about the current business economy. At the moment, employee layoffs are at an all-time high. Employee retention right now is not such a concern as it is during even a normal economy. But the economy and business will rebound, and, according to experts, probably by the end of 2009 or early 2010 (?).

The Future

It may be surprising to learn the results that the Society for Human Resource Management and CareerJournal.com found after surveying 451 HR professionals and 300 executive or managerial employees.

A large percentage of the executive/managerial employees said they would seek to "jump ship" in the presence of a rebounding economy. Why? For better compensation and benefits, or because of dissatisfaction with potential career progression, or desire to seek "a new experience."

Creative HR organizations, looking forward to 2010 or beyond, have surveyed employees and found that they want more support for family needs, wellness programs, intranet (inside the company) interactivity and social media tools, live events to bring employees together more, increased job mentoring and OJT, as well as point-based recognition and rewards programs. Maslow, again, appears in these employee needs and the retention responses to them.

And the ultimate future employee retention program will be customized for each employee.

Supervisors will sit down with each direct report and the result will be a list of the employee's personal "de-motivators," motivators, and "things they would like to see happen." Out of this the supervisor will commit to eliminating one of their personal de-motivators within the next 30 days, and "doing something" about their desired future with the company over the next month.

In 90 days, the process will be repeated as a progress report. Most important is to walk the walk!

Different incentives per different industry/how do they compare?

It is a widely known fact that if we look at two different companies in the same industry that make the same product or provide the same service, they will each see employee retention from entirely different perspectives. That is because one management team has a different set of values, visions and styles and different past experiences than the other. Compensation levels differ, of course, between industries, as do retention programs, their aims and… READ MORE

How to Reference "Employee Retention" Essay in a Bibliography

Related Essays:

Employee Retention Term Paper

Employee Retention

The hospitality industry has seemingly exponential growth potential as the economies of many nations begin to merge, creating an environment of heavy travel and increased dependence on an… read more

Term Paper 17 pages (4777 words) Sources: 10 Style: APA Topic: Career / Labor / Human Resources

---

Effective Employee Feedback Programs Term Paper

Employee feedback programs are programs that are developed for companies to gather feedback from employees, whether negative or positive, and give them a chance to have their voice heard. These… read more

Term Paper 10 pages (2835 words) Sources: 10 Topic: Management / Organizations

---

Employee Training and Career Development Research Paper

Employee Training & Career Development:

Employee development in an organization basically entails training these workers to develop hidden talents or obtain new skills in order to keep them acquainted with… read more

Research Paper 3 pages (873 words) Sources: 3 Topic: Career / Labor / Human Resources

---

What Are Some Other Canadian Companies Doing to Retain Employees? Research Proposal

Employee Retention

As Canadian businesses begin to better understand the costs of employee turnover, they seek to find ways to improve employee retention. Attracting and training new employees can cost… read more

Research Proposal 3 pages (964 words) Sources: 3 Style: MLA Topic: Career / Labor / Human Resources

---

Employee Engagement Research Paper

Employee Engagement

This research report intends to analyze the fundamental concept of employee engagement as an instrument for facilitating high-level business purposes. In the literature review part, it will provide… read more

Research Paper 7 pages (2199 words) Sources: 20 Topic: Management / Organizations

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>