Research Proposal on "Drug Courts"

Research Proposal 4 pages (1370 words) Sources: 3

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Drug Courts

One of the increasing trends in the justice system on a state by state basis has been the establishment of drug courts. The impetus behind the creation of the drug court is twofold: children and mothers. The creation of the drug courts is a response to the needs of women and children, most of who fall into statistical categories related to single parent families, poverty, and abuse. Drug courts are an effort on the part of the justice system to deal with women and children who come before the court as criminals, and who are faced with potential incarceration, in different and innovative ways. The goal is not to separate mothers from their children who could become wards of the state. As wards of the state, the children become part of a system that could keep mothers and their children separated for years, even life. For children, the drug courts represent the effort to keep these children out of the prison system, and to give them and their families an opportunity to redirect their lives away from drugs and the penal system (Schwebel, R., 2002, p. 176).

This essay is a brief examination of the drug courts, especially the extent to which they have been successful. How are the courts making this new approach to women and children work? This question will be the focus of this essay, and the answer will be culled from existing journal studies and books on drug courts.

The Drug Courts

The drug courts bean initially as an experiment. The idea was make separate those cases that upon pretrial review were determined to be salvageable. By that, it is meant that the people who were to appear before the court, looked like first-time offenders, mentally ill clients, or women. Often times these people were experiencing difficult times, and the reversal of their fortunes might begin with the opportunity to receive counseling, and they could turn their lives around.

Drug courts first made their appearance in the late 1980s, against the backdrop of the "extreme pressures placed on both the judicial process and local correctional populations" by the increasingly punitive drug policies of the 1980s. (35) as has been often noted, the United States declared a "war on drugs" in the 1980s, driven at least in part by broad public fears of a perceived crack cocaine epidemic. (36) Throughout the decade, the federal government and many states "increased public spending on antidrug law enforcement and dramatically augmented criminal penalties for the sale and possession of illegal drugs," (37) with the federal government instituting mandatory minimum sentences for some drug crimes. (38) Between 1980 and 1993, American prison and jail populations tripled, much of the increase due to increased number of drug convictions and longer sentences for drug offenses. (39) by 1994, "drug traffickers (19%) and drug possessors (12.5%) together made up 31.4% of felons convicted in [s]tate courts," (40) and over half of all federal prisoners were drug offenders. (41) Even as law enforcement efforts intensified and sanctions for drug offenders were made more severe, publicly funded treatment became a lower priority (Armstrong, Andrew, 2003, 133)."

Very quickly law makers and legal representatives realized that the early drug courts worked. The courts removed the participants from the criminal system, although there was always that the caveat that failure could be mean returning to that system (133). The court actually became a partner in the pursuit of the client's sobriety and treatment (133). The court would regularly review the cases adherence to the sobriety protocols of the program (133). This legal supervision actually served as an incentive for the participants to become sober, and to remain that way.

Speaking at a New York State meeting on drug courts, social worker, Nahama Broner, from the New York University School of Social Work, commented that the drug courts were making a positive difference in the lives of families in New York State (Conference, 2002, 1858). Broner encouraged the many lawmakers and judicial system participants in the meeting to work to expand the drug courts, which recognized the treatable condition as a social… READ MORE

How to Reference "Drug Courts" Research Proposal in a Bibliography

Related Research Proposals:

Social Problem Drug Abuse Research Paper

Social Problem - Drug Abuse

Drug Abuse

Drug abuse refers to excessive use of drugs with an intention of altering one's mood, emotion or state of consciousness. Buddy T. (2011)… read more

Research Paper 5 pages (2108 words) Sources: 8 Topic: Drugs / Alcohol / Tobacco

---

Effect of Drug Courts on Drug Abuse and Criminal Offending Research Paper

Drug Courts on Drug Abuse and Criminal Offending

Over the past decades, drug courts have been fronted as the answer to the rapidly growing numbers of drug related offenders taken… read more

Research Paper 6 pages (2106 words) Sources: 12 Topic: Drugs / Alcohol / Tobacco

---

Drug Legalization Term Paper

Drug Legalization

As the country was turning into the 20th century, drugs that were in the market were largely unregulated. There were medical remedies that often contained derivatives of cocaine… read more

Term Paper 12 pages (3788 words) Sources: 15 Style: MLA Topic: Drugs / Alcohol / Tobacco

---

Drug Testing Term Paper

Drug testing without the consent of pregnant women [...] this question in the moral terms of utilitarian considerations, including who will be helped and who hurt over the long-term, and… read more

Term Paper 5 pages (1704 words) Sources: 3 Style: MLA Topic: Drugs / Alcohol / Tobacco

---

Drug Testing in High School Not Just Dealing With Drug Testing Athletes but All Students Research Proposal

Drug Testing in High School

The objective of this work is to examine the issue of drug testing in high school and not just in terms of drug testing athletes… read more

Research Proposal 6 pages (1700 words) Sources: 6 Style: APA Topic: Drugs / Alcohol / Tobacco

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>