Term Paper on "Compare and Contrast California's 2011 Statewide Redistricting Process With the One Done in 2001"

Term Paper 10 pages (2557 words) Sources: 10

[EXCERPT] . . . .

districting process in the state of California. We present and analysis of the practices and factors that have caused the general public and scholars to criticize the 2001 redistricting process. This discussion is carried out in comparison to the 2011 redistricting process. A comparison is made with the need of supporting the full implementation of the 2011 redistricting princess. This is in light of the serious flaws that are dominant in the 2001 redistricting framework.

The redistricting process which refers to the process of drawing U.S. electoral boundaries as a consequence of the changes in population is determined by the outcome of the decennial census (U.S. Census Bureau 1).In the thirty six states, the state legislature is mandated with the responsibility of drafting a redistricting plan and in many cases the plan is subject to state governor approval. In an effort of reducing the role that is played by legislative politics, states such as California engage in a congressional redistricting via an independent or through a bipartisan commission.

The problem statement

A review of extant literature suggests that partisan domination of the existing state legislatures as well as the use of improved technologies in the redesigning of the contiguous districts that end up packing the opponents into fewer districts as lead to the skewing of the district maps to favor one party. One of the most serious crimes that arises due to skewed redistricting is gerrymandering which is a practice carried out in an effort of establishing a political advantage for a given group or party through the manipulation of the geographic boundaries so as to create an partisan as well as incumbent-protected districts. The created district is referred to as a gerrymander. Gerrymandering can be used in an effort of creating desired electoral results for a given political party. It may also be used in either helping or hindering a given demographic like political, linguistic, racial, class or religious group.

In the U.S., the constitution stipulates that a census be carried out each and every ten years in order ensure the reapportion representation in the country's House of representative. The constitution implicitly allows for the drafting of the political districts after each census to the various states. The federal courts have also defined very strict guidelines to be use in the drawing of the various district boundaries within the U.S. territories. A few constraints however, have been placed on these states in order for to guide who should draw as well as approve the various district boundaries. The states have therefore set certain responsibilities to this political task to various officials (MacDonald 20).This is the case in California in which the state legislature drew congressional district boundaries in the year 2002 with the consequence of gerrymandering.

An overview of the Californian redistricting process

After every ten years, the population of people residing in California is determined through a federal census. The Constitution of California requires the state's legislative assembly to redraw the boundaries of the districts which are used to elect representatives in the public service. This process has effects on the legislature of the State, Board of Equalization and the United States House of Representatives. The main purpose of redistricting is to make sure that all districts have fairly equal population. Redistricting involves the process of drawing new boundary lines for districts that have political representation. According to the Act of Voting Rights that was signed into law in 1965 was very instrumental in giving rights to the minority groups in the political arena in the United States of America. This act also increased the proportion of representation for the minority communities and consequently their rights and interests were represented in the Californian state political intrigues. In spite of the Supreme Court of the Unites states of America passing a ruling that a minority group should make up at least 50% of its population of the voting age in a district, this act criminalizes discrimination based in skin color, language or political affiliation while undertaking the process of drawing new district lines. Through the process of redistricting, all new and old districts should have approximately the same population based on the census data. This is to respect for the basic of principles of democracy of one person one vote, (League of Women Voters of California Education Fund 2)

Redistricting in the state of California is done after every 10 years. With the last one done in 2001 the next one is scheduled for this year, 2011. Unlike in 2001 the responsibility of redrawing the district lines was moved from the elective representatives to a 14 member commission that is composed of representatives from Democrats, Republicans and any 4 registered voters from neither of the two parties. The commission should hold public hearings as it endeavors to develop plan for the process of redistricting. In addition the commission needs not less than nine members voting yes three of which should come from each block of its membership such as democrats, republicans and the others. The commissions' approval of any redistricting plan is to be used for the next ten years until the next commission is put in place.

Introduction

Redistricting:

After every 10 years in the United States of America a census is conducted .following the census, boundaries change to reflect the current population of counties, cities and other jurisdictions that have internal governing districts

.Structure of Proposition 11:

14 person redistricting commission; would create a politically balanced commission -- 5 Democrats, 5 Republicans, 4 others . The Commissioners would be chosen for their impartiality, Skills, and to reflect our states demographic and geographic diversity, proposition 11 would create a list of prioritized mapping criteria for the commission to follow .This would follow ensure that our constitution, federal and state laws are followed .California's communities; cities and counties must be respected.

Open public process. The commission would hold hearings to receive public input .Prop 11 would end the closed -- door political deals by legislator to draw district that protect themselves.

In comparisons to the redistricting in 2001, it didn't observe the Prop 11 which is meant to protect and serve the interest of the voters and provide an equal opportunity on a fair platform .

Effects Gerrymandering:

Reduces accountability

Gerrymandering reduces electoral competition and can virtually assure incumbents re-election representatives become less accountable to their constituents. More partisanship there is always an experience of strife in state legislature that enacts them and contributes to polarization in the congress because safe districts enable the election of representatives who need not to appeal moderate voters.

The electoral outcomes of redistricting

A review of extant literature reveals that congressional redistricting has a strong link to the decline is the number of competitive seats in the U.S. congress as well as the partisan imbalance of the seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. Tufle in 1973 was among the very first scholars to suggest that the process of redistricting can be helpful in explaining the increase in the level of incumbency advantage in the U.S. congress. He noted a general decline in the level of competition immediately after the redistribution cycles. He argued that the incumbents would easily influence the process of redistricting in order to save their congressional seats.

The work of other scholars such as Abramowitz in 1993 clearly documented the advantages that democratic candidates gained in 1982 in their elections through the control of the districting process. Redistricting has been shown to affect the level of electoral competitiveness. Other that the partisan advantage attached to the process, redistricting has been shown to affect the level of electoral competitiveness.

A comparison between the 2001 and 2011 redistricting framework in California

A look at the two redistricting framework reveals several similarities. Both frameworks are shown to take place with a lot of partisan interests being vested. It is also a fact that both 2001 and 2011 redistricting frameworks have generated quite a lot of political and scholarly debates in regard to their influences on various policies such as racial and gender representation.

The contrast that exists between the 2001 and 2011 redistricting framework in California

Both redistricting frameworks have been shown to have critical differences. The most notable one is that in the 2001 redistricting process, all the power of implementation and decision was done by the state legislature and the governor. The 2011 redistricting process however is spearheaded by the legislature, governor and a citizen committee/council. The 2001 redistricting process led to various vises such as incumbency protection and gerrymandering (Forgette and Platt 945).The main reason as to why I object the 2001 redistricting process gerrymandering. This malpractice has several demerits.

The reduction in the level of electoral competition as well as voter turnout

A review of literature reveals that the most dominant effect of effect gerrymandering is that it makes the electoral process to be less competitive in almost all the established districts. This is because the electoral margins of their victory continuously become greater leading them… READ MORE

How to Reference "Compare and Contrast California's 2011 Statewide Redistricting Process With the One Done in 2001" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Related Term Papers:

Project Management Compare and Contrast Teradyne's Traditional Term Paper

Project Management

Compare and contrast Teradyne's traditional project execution strategy to the approach it used in Jaguar? What was similar? What was different?

Teradyne traditionally relied on a more collaborative… read more

Term Paper 3 pages (776 words) Sources: 0 Topic: Management / Organizations

---

California's Accounting Code of Ethics Term Paper

California's Accounting Code Of Ethics

Ethics has always been an important part of business transactions. Freedoms of information, stricter government regulations and electronic media have made ethics even more essential… read more

Term Paper 4 pages (1051 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Accounting / Auditing

---

English Literature Compare and Contrast Richard Connell Essay

English Literature

Compare and Contrast Richard Connell's "The Most Dangerous Game" with DH Thesis

Both Connell and Lawrence's stories involve masculine characters; although the two would appear on the surface… read more

Essay 3 pages (1096 words) Sources: 0 Topic: Philosophy / Logic / Reason

---

California's Natural Resources and Economic Development Essay

California Natural Resources

California is now one of the largest regional economies in the world and its success is one of the pillars which made the United States an economic… read more

Essay 5 pages (1647 words) Sources: 1 Topic: Energy / Power

---

Comparing and Contrasting of Environmental Policies Term Paper

Environmental Policies

Comparing and Contrasting Waste Reduction and Recycling Policies at Universal Studios and the Walt Disney Company

Universal Studios

Universal Studios has worked closely with the California Solid Waste… read more

Term Paper 1 pages (375 words) Sources: 2 Style: APA Topic: Environment / Conservation / Ecology

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>