Term Paper on "Democratic Stability in Britain and France"
Term Paper 4 pages (1446 words) Sources: 3 Style: MLA
[EXCERPT] . . . .
Democratic Stability in Britain and FranceThe history of the Europeans continent was marked by constant struggles between powers, state, and institutions which determined throughout history changes at the level of the European societies and of the states themselves. France and Britain can be seen from this point-of-view as being some of the most relevant examples. They are two countries in deep contrast when discussing the issue of democracy and its historical evolution in the countries. In this sense, while France is famous for its revolutionary spirit and for the sudden changes that marked its society, Great Britain is seen as the cradle of democracy, with a slow, yet constant evolution of the democratic process. By comparison, it must be said that an essential role in the different evolution of democracy is held by the institutional framework in each country. Therefore it is important to take into account this aspect when considering the democracies in both states.
The institutional theory argues first and foremost a deep reliance on the state for offering a framework for development. More precisely, institutions are essential for the way in which the affairs of a state are conducted. They offer the strategic background for the decisions that are taken in the country, as well as the tools for leading that country. From this perspective, France and Britain are different taking into account their historical background.
From the very beginning, Great Britain was a monarchy (Berstein and Milza, 1994). The institution of the monarchy represented for the UK an important, if not essential post of stability. First and foremost, it was a framework which enab
download full paper ⤓
By comparison, France had a much more troubled history. Indeed, in the early centuries of the existence of the state, there were several French monarchs ruling in the territories (Berstein and Milza, 1994). However, religion and culture united them under a common belief that would later be embodied in the institution of the monarchy. Despite the fact that in both Britain and France, there was a monarchic rule, the French example is quite different from the English one. More precisely, France has a tradition of authoritarian rule from the early beginnings of its history, especially due to the fact that the French rulers were often forced to have a strong grip on power in order to avert the failures in the confrontations with the Germans. At the same time, the ruling Families always had a troubled history, with dynastical struggles and attempts to oust the heir from the royal post. Therefore, it can be said that from a first point-of-view, the French monarchy did not reassemble the British one because of the lack of stability the former provided for its people and subjects.
Secondly, the history of the French rule was constantly marked by attempts to undermine the authoritarian rule of the king. This is largely because the Church played a significant role in establishing the equilibrium between the state and the church (Braunstein and Pepin, 1998). From this point-of-view, the Reformation of the Catholic Church put great pressure on the way in which the monarchy would cater for the spiritual needs of all its subjects. However, the struggles and fights that marked the 18th and 19th century in this sense were relevant for pointing out that the institution of the monarchy could not deliver a clear… READ MORE
Quoted Instructions for "Democratic Stability in Britain and France" Assignment:
The best essays open with a direct and clear answer to the question. Consider making the opening sentence of the essay something like "I believe X provides the best explanation of these events." The best essays proceed from there to clear arguments which develop that answer. Then, when discussing the causes believed to be most important, they discuss the -same- causes in both countries; they use concrete examples or facts to support their claims; and they at least briefly explain why one (or more) competing possible cause is not as persuasive an explanation for the outcome as the one you've chosen to advocate.
Question: Britain and France had very different experiences with democratic stability. While Britain democratized only very slowly, it never experienced a breakdown and return to authoritarian rule. In contrast, while France did not experience a democratic breakdown in the same way as Weimar Germany or interwar Spain, its democratic experiments proved more precarious. Which of the factors we've considered -- institutions, cultural factors, or economic interest-based issues -- do you believe best explains this contrast?
Choose one of the three types of explanations: institutional, interest-based, and ideational to explain the outcome. (Note that a good explanation must account for the different outcomes in both countries.)
Be specific: E.g. If you make an institutional argument, explain which specific institutions have caused the outcome, do not just say it*****s institutions. If there is more than one institution that matters, then make it clear how the institutions work together to bring about the outcome.
Explain why and how we see different outcomes in the two countries. Do not simply state the facts. Trace the causal processes: E.g. In an institutional argument elaborate why/how the specific institutions cause the outcome. If you claim it*****s electoral laws, what are the effect of these laws and do these effects contribute to democratic stability/instability.
How to Reference "Democratic Stability in Britain and France" Term Paper in a Bibliography
“Democratic Stability in Britain and France.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2008, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/democratic-stability-britain/63836. Accessed 5 Jul 2024.
Related Term Papers:
German Reunification Term Paper
Reunification on the German State and People Today
The physical Berlin Wall may be gone, but some observers suggest that it remains in the minds of many older Germans that… read more
Term Paper 23 pages (7928 words) Sources: 7 Style: Chicago Topic: World History
Political and Economic Prospects for the Third World Research Paper
Political and Economic Prospects for Pakistan and Syria
Main Elements of political prospects of Pakistan and Syria
General comparison: Syria and Pakistan
Level of political stability
Level of economic prosperity… read more
Research Paper 8 pages (2558 words) Sources: 8 Topic: Israel / Palestine / Arab World
Future of Cuba Term Paper
Cuba After Castro
Cuba is an island nation some 90 miles from Florida, and proximity alone gives this country great importance in the thinking of American leaders. More than this,… read more
Term Paper 80 pages (20759 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: World History
Marshall Plan and the Post 911 Global Research Paper
Marshall Plan and the Post 911 Global War on Terror
Many times in the history of the world, war or its aftermath has threatened catastrophe. Following the end of the… read more
Research Paper 20 pages (6775 words) Sources: 10 Style: MLA Topic: World History
Roots of Terrorism in the Middle East Term Paper
Roots of Terrorism in the Middle East
When individuals inhabit the same space, conflicts often occur. But it's only when conflicts degenerate into harsh violence of any sort that the… read more
Term Paper 12 pages (4050 words) Sources: 3 Style: APA Topic: Terrorism / Extremism / Radicalization
Fri, Jul 5, 2024
If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!
We can write a new, 100% unique paper!