Term Paper on "Death Penalty Is a Subject of Hot"

Home > Topics > Criminal Justice My Account

Term Paper 5 pages (1251 words) Sources: 1+

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Death penalty is a subject of hot debate all across the United States. Each side of the issue, whether for or against, firmly believe in their convictions. Those who advocate the death penalty believe that it is a just punishment for heinous crimes and necessary in a civilized society. However, how civilized is a society that resorts to the death penalty as punishment? The death penalty is a barbaric practice that all too often results in the execution of the innocent.

There are numerous arguments justifying the death penalty, the strongest being determent and retaliation. In a 1986 Harvard Law Review, Ernest van den Haag defended the practice of capital punishment. According to Haag, there is an average of 20,000 homicides per year in the United States, fewer than 300 convicted murderers are sentenced to death, yet no more than thirty murderers have been executed in any recent year, thus most murderers sentenced to death will likely die of old age (Haag pp). Arguing against the possibility of miscarriage of justice, Haag cited a survey by Professors Hugo Adam Bedau and Michael Radelet who found that of the 7,000 persons executed in the United States between 1900 and 1985, only 35 were innocent of capital crimes (Haag pp). Therefore, Haag and other advocates believe that "miscarriages of justice are offset by the moral benefits and the usefulness of doing justice" (Haag pp).

Haag, as others believe that due to the finality of the death penalty, it is more feared than imprisonment, and thus deters some prospective murderers who would not be deterred by the thought of imprisonment (Haag pp). Therefore, if the death penalty practice deters even a few murders and spares the life

Continue scrolling to

download full paper ⤓

of even one victim, then it is justified and a value to society (Haag pp).

According to Haag, punishment, regardless of motivation, "is not intended to revenge, offset or compensate for the victim's suffering, or to be measured by it, but is to vindicate the law and the social order undermined by the crime" (Haag pp). This, says Haag, is why a kidnapper's imprisonment is not limited to the period for which he imprisoned his victim, nor is a burglar's confinement meant to offset the suffering and harm he caused his victim nor offset the advantage he gained (Haag pp).

To those who believe that by executing a murderer society is encouraging, endorsing and legitimizing unlawful killing, Haag responds that "although all punishments are meant to be unpleasant, it is seldom argued that they legitimize the unlawful imposition of identical unpleasantness" (Haag pp).

According to Haag, society does not believe that imprisonment legitimizes kidnapping or that fines legitimize robbery (Haag pp). Says Haag,

The difference between murder and execution, or between kidnapping and imprisonment, is that the first is unlawful and undeserved, the second a lawful and deserved punishment for an unlawful act.

The physical similarities of the punishment to the crime are irrelevant. The relevant difference is not physical, but social"

Haag pp).

Haag and other advocates feel the death penalty is a right and just punishment for murderers and is a useful practice for society.

Jack Greenberg in the 1986 Harvard Law Review said that "America simply does not have the kind of capital punishment system contemplated by death penalty partisans" (Greenberg pp). Greenberg says that the system of capital punishment results in infrequent, random, and erratic executions, and clearly fails when measured against the most common justifications for the infliction of punishment, deterrence, and retribution" (Greenberg Pp). Regarding the argument that the death penalty acts as a deterrent, Greenberg responds that the majority of killers do no engage in a cost-benefit analysis because murderers are impulsive people who kill impulsively, they don't weigh the options of punishment, therefore… READ MORE

Download Full Paper

Write a New Paper for Me

Quoted Instructions for "Death Penalty Is a Subject of Hot" Assignment:

“

Take a position (against) on the death penalty. Form an opening statement, consider views of groups for the death penalty, and draw a conclusion.

How to Reference "Death Penalty Is a Subject of Hot" Term Paper in a Bibliography

“Death Penalty Is a Subject of Hot.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2004, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/death-penalty-subject/8783397. Accessed 5 Oct 2024.

Death Penalty Is a Subject of Hot (2004). Retrieved from https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/death-penalty-subject/8783397

A1-TermPaper.com. (2004). Death Penalty Is a Subject of Hot. [online] Available at: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/death-penalty-subject/8783397 [Accessed 5 Oct, 2024].

”Death Penalty Is a Subject of Hot” 2004. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/death-penalty-subject/8783397.

”Death Penalty Is a Subject of Hot” A1-TermPaper.com, Last modified 2024. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/death-penalty-subject/8783397.

[1] ”Death Penalty Is a Subject of Hot”, A1-TermPaper.com, 2004. [Online]. Available: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/death-penalty-subject/8783397. [Accessed: 5-Oct-2024].

1. Death Penalty Is a Subject of Hot [Internet]. A1-TermPaper.com. 2004 [cited 5 October 2024]. Available from: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/death-penalty-subject/8783397

1. Death Penalty Is a Subject of Hot. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/death-penalty-subject/8783397. Published 2004. Accessed October 5, 2024.

Related Term Papers: