Term Paper on "Critical Review of Stalingrad by Antony Beevor"
Term Paper 5 pages (1847 words) Sources: 1+ Style: Turabian
[EXCERPT] . . . .
Critical Review of Stalingrad by Antony BeevorThere is no doubt Stalingrad was a major event in perhaps the most
significant war in world history. In Stalingrad: The Fateful Siege: 1942-
1943, by Antony Beevor, it is clear that Beevor believes this to be the
case because he says so. However, after reading Stalingrad, it is not
entirely clear why. While Beevor puts the battle of Stalingrad in
historical perspective in Stalingrad, there lacks certain emotional impact,
historical narrative, and cohesion that could lend it to furthering the
aims of the book. While it is clear that the book looks to put the
everyday person or soldier as the significant player in the Battle and thus
the War, there needs to be more connections made in order to bring to life
this battle in which every brick in Stalingrad became a brick of a fortress
critical to the fate of two world superpowers.
Nevertheless, it is clear that Stalingrad was important for one
reason; it was named after Stalin. Beevor reports that Hitler said, "I
wanted to reach.... At a particular city.... By chance it bore the name of
Stalin himself,"[i] which suggests that Hitler in fact did not care about
the symbolism associated with the name. But to the contrary, Beevor hints
that there was something about this city and its name that gave it a
greater importance to both Hitler and Stalin. Yet while Hitler and Stalin
are constantly referred to, usually pessimistically, they are two distant
Commanders. Often portrayed as foolish, out of
download full paper ⤓
Hitler and Stalin according to Beevor are distant figureheads. While that
may have been true to the average Soviet or German, they were in fact
puling the strings and greatly influential in the ongoing war and the
Battle of Stalingrad. Yet, like much of this work, Stalin and Hitler are
all too lifeless, and that may be the effect that Beevor intended, but
because the lifelessness permeates other areas of the work, that is not
likely to be the case.
But this does not mean that Stalingrad is not an effective and worthy
addition to the historical literature on the famous battle. Beevor has
painstakingly researched, and clearly communicated his research on the
battle of Stalingrad, much of which relies on primary resource. This
validates Beevor's position as a historian first and foremost and makes
Stalingrad an accurate, detailed, informative, and even unique work.
Drawing on much of his own research gives Stalingrad an extra special place
in the literature on the war, and although Beevor does not always write
proficiently enough to capture the life of the battle and it's
participants, he does include many anecdotes and insight that helps the
reader to get a better understanding of the life and times surrounding
Stalingrad. For instance, the mentioning of that "many soldiers...
deprived of vodka, resorted to desperate substitutes"[ii] is interesting in
that it shows the conditions of life for the soldiers as well as the
deleterious mental and health effects that they had to endure. As a
particularly 'Russian' problem, this does help to illustrate the plight of
those in the Red Army and all of those in Stalingrad who had to endure the
brutalities of the siege.
Before the battle begins, however, Beevor starts his work before the
declaration of war between the Soviet Union and Germany. He finds a
fitting quote, in which the Soviets warn the Germans: "You're regret this
insulting, provocative and thoroughly predatory attack on the Soviet Union.
You'll pay dearly for it."[iii] This, in the beginning, helps to
highlight a prevailing theme throughout the work, and that is the resolve
and fortitude of the Soviet people who seemingly willed their way to
victory. Yet it also indicates that perhaps Soviet victory was inevitable,
given the manpower and depth of their country, that despite the countless
problems and terror raging in the Soviet Union, its soldiers were still
willing to die for the Motherland. This is an important idea that goes
beyond battlefield tactics, and while Beevor does touch on the military
aspects of Stalingrad, in Stalingrad Beevor makes it clear that the Soviets
were a very special people destined to do special things.
Yet despite this interesting outlook on Stalingrad, the work his
fairly disjointed and lacks a coherent narrative. The beginning of the
book jumps into the action and jumps around before the reader can
understand the implications or impact of what he or she is reading. The
end of Part One also seems to be lacking as it ends with a broad statement
that cannot be fully grasped by the reader after reading Part One and after
continuing: "The psychological turning point of the war, however, would
come only in the following winter," writes Beevor suggesting that the war
was that it was a duel between Hitler and Stalin that became one of "mass
proxy."[iv] This statement is almost alone on an island, with little
connection to the words before and after it and while it may be true,
Beevor does not adequately connect his points to the facts in a way in
which the reader can fully grasp what he is trying to say.
Then Beevor gets into the battle of Stalingrad and his details are
surely accurate. But that is all that can be said as though the battle is
covered in depth, it is not effectively portrayed and it is at times poorly
written. An interesting dialogue between Voronov and Paulus after the
surrender should be intriguing; at the very least a good piece of writing
that will stand alone as a story by itself. But Beevor leaves the reader
lacking for more as he merely and dryly details the story often relying on
the words of the primary source to tell the story for him. It fails to do
so. "In this 'tormented pose,'" writes Beevor of Paulus in his depression
as, "only the tic in his face indicated his thoughts."[v] The stories
cannot stand alone and they do not heighten the emotional impact of
Stalingrad to the reader. With the aforementioned vodka incident, while it
is a worthy inclusion, it could be improved. Perhaps some analysis, drama,
or commentary could help to bring the history to life as a narrative as
Beevor writes the stories as if they were fact sheets. A reading of the
original source would surely be more interesting.
This may be too harsh on Beevor as Stalingrad is an informative look
at the famous battle, but one reads Stalingrad and can only think there
could be so much more. It fails to live up to the front cover hype as a
"compelling narrative" creating a "terrifying montage of catastrophe and
hardship" that is an "apocalyptic vision."[vi] It is doubtless that the
battle was as hard as described, but it is up to the reader to envision the
hardships for him or herself. The short, simple, and straightforward
sentences leave much to be desired: "In such a hopeless situation,
discipline was starting to break down,"[vii] writes Beevor of the decimated
Germans. But the connection is not made by Beevor; instead it is left up
to the reader. What was hopeless? How did hopelessness lead to a lack of
discipline? The events are merely described and not brought to life. The
historical narrative is lacking. Of course simplicity and clarity are of
paramount importance in historical non-fiction, but so should also the
writing as it is up to the author to effectively relay the information he
has researched.
Perhaps one of the greatest achievements of Stalingrad, is the
portrayal of the ineffectiveness of many of the leaders of those that would
suffer from the conflict. For instance, the miscalculations by both Hitler
and Stalin are mentioned and they occur on numerous occasions which makes
for an interesting outlook on history in which the two dictators are
critiqued and the mistakes are clearly demonstrated. For example, it is
dead on and an important point when Beevor notes that the "Stalin still
desperately hoped for a last chance of conciliation and was reluctant to
allow his troops to strike."[viii] Points like this help to illustrate
Stalin's misreading of the situation, and help to shed light on the bigger
picture and all the factors that lead up to Stalingrad. Thus Beevor does
have good points and information to contribute to Stalingrad and this
cannot be overlooked. In one of his most effective parts of the work,
Beevor accounts for the horros of the first attack on Stalingrad: "The
model city of which they were so proud, with its gardens along the high
west bank of the Volga and the tall white apartment buildings which gave
the place its modern, cubist look, became an inferno."[ix] This
comparative illustration of the damage done to the beloved city connects
the damage to the people and creates a sort of emotional impact that is
lacking in much of the book and furthers Beevor's aim of showing that
Stalingrad was a battle… READ MORE
Quoted Instructions for "Critical Review of Stalingrad by Antony Beevor" Assignment:
Require a 5 page critical review of Anthony Beevor's Stalindgrad: The Fateful Siege: 1942-1943. Would like at a minumum 8 endnotes.
How to Reference "Critical Review of Stalingrad by Antony Beevor" Term Paper in a Bibliography
“Critical Review of Stalingrad by Antony Beevor.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2007, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/critical-review-stalingrad/7735. Accessed 5 Oct 2024.
Related Term Papers:
Decision-Making Critical Review Vroom, V.H., and Jago Research Paper
Decision-Making Critical Review
Vroom, V.H., & Jago, A.G. (1974). Decision Making As A Social Process: Normative And
Descriptive Models Of Leader Behavior. Decision Sciences, 5(4), 743-769.
Decision making ability is… read more
Research Paper 8 pages (2517 words) Sources: 8 Topic: Psychology / Behavior / Psychiatry
Nursing: Comparative Critical Review Term Paper
Nursing: Comparative Critical Review
To analyze the most pertinent data from a review of literature concerning the problems following discharge after intensive care during the recovery period in the weeks… read more
Term Paper 10 pages (3585 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Healthcare / Health / Obamacare
Critical Review of Him We Proclaim by Dennis Johnson Book Review
Johnson portrays a well- thought of and rounded argument for an apostolic reading and preaching of Scripture, stressing Christ, redemptive accounts, missions and God's grace. The stress properly displays the… read more
Book Review 8 pages (2532 words) Sources: 1 Topic:
Epistemology Critical Review of Jay Wood Term Paper
Epistemology
Critical Review of Jay Wood's "Epistemology: Becoming Intellectually Virtuous."
In his work Epistemology: Becoming Intellectually Virtuous Jay Wood embarks on a journey to discover what it means to know… read more
Term Paper 8 pages (2159 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Ethics / Morality
Finances Critical Book Reviews "America's Oligarchy" Johnson Book Review
Finances
Critical Book Reviews
"America's Oligarchy"
Johnson, Simon., & Kwak, James. (2010). The wall street takeover and the next financial Meltdown. New York: Pantheon Books.
Paperback: $15.95
ISBN: 030747660X
Knopf… read more
Book Review 10 pages (2634 words) Sources: 10 Topic: Economics / Finance / Banking
Sat, Oct 5, 2024
If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!
We can write a new, 100% unique paper!