Term Paper on "Criminal Science Conflict Theory: Marx, NAFTA"

Term Paper 10 pages (3370 words) Sources: 8 Style: APA

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Criminal Science

Conflict Theory:

Marx, NAFTA, and the Populations of the United States, Canada, and Mexico

Our world is made up of many different groups of individuals. In nation-states such as the United States, Canada, and Mexico, various classes vie for power, status, influence, and control.

The contending faction may be economic, social, or cultural in origin, or else be defined by gender, race, or religion. As one group seeks to consolidate its hold over society, it formulates an ideology; the group in power establishing the dominant or normative view of social relations and cultural thinking. Less powerful groups challenge these modes of thought, and creating their own philosophies that are often labeled deviant or maladaptive by those in power. Change, gradual or sudden, peaceful or violent, is frequently the result of these battles between the ruling group and its rivals. Conflict theory is an attempt to understand and study these patters of group identity and often revolutionary change. Karl Marx, in particular, helped to establish the foundations of conflict theory, his ideas focusing on the society's inherent potential for class warfare. Indeed, his master work, Das Kapital, is a veritable primer of the concept. Marx firmly believed in the necessity of social conflict as a means of fulfilling the promises of history. Through its operation, the oppressed lower classes would eventually receive their due, recapturing the economic power and well-being that was theirs by right. The modern day drive toward the ever greater expansion and reach of business appears to be pushing the peoples of the world together into one great global community. The philosophy of globalism demands that national governments give way to supranational organizations that support the interests of multinational corporations in a kind of worldwide "business without borders." The North American Free Trade Association, or NAFTA, is one of these multinational organizations. What would Karl Marx think of NAFTA's high-sounding promises of prosperity and equality for each and every inhabitant of the United States, Canada, and Mexico?

Marx's theory of social conflict is based preeminently on the Hegelian dialect. German philosopher, Georg Hegel, postulated a situation in which an original idea, or thesis, was opposed by an alternative idea, its antithesis. When the two came into conflict they eventually produced an entirely new idea, or synthesis. Marx's contribution to this concept was his substitution of Hegel's notion of a world that was motivated primarily by the power of ideas with one that operated almost exclusively along economic lines, thereby "demystifying" the earlier thinker's more abstruse and objective outlook (Wood, 2004, p. 215). The founder of communism believed that the different economic classes within society were locked in combat with one another, the bourgeoisie, or capitalist class temporarily dominant over the masses of workers, or proletariat. Finally, the proletariat would revolt, overthrow the rapacious bourgeoisie, take control of the means of production, and establish a utopia in which all individuals were equal and everything was owned in common. The distinctions of wealth and status that lay at the root of social conflict would be forever abolished (Bronner, 2001, p. 14).

The basic ideas of Marx contain the fundamental principles of modern concepts of conflict theory. Class conflict leads to stratification with the ruling class developing patterns of behavior to which all other classes of society must aspire and adhere. An example of this that pertains to a modern free market society would be that society's emphasis on the creation an acquisition of wealth, a motive that even gained religious sanction in the thinking of John Calvin and other Protestant theologians (Nollmann & Strasser, 2007).

Two centuries ago, Adam Smith, and today, economists like Milton Friedman and Alan Greenspan, could be secular theorists along the same lines. All believe firmly in the continued importance of markets, and the creation and control of money, as roads to maximizing material prosperity. In this view, maximum material success accords with maximum human happiness. Ideally, all other viewpoints are marginalized or suppressed.

Globalism; therefore, represents an attempt to maximize the benefits of free market capitalism by permitting privately-owned business the widest possible latitude for its operation. Much as Marx tried to educate the masses about their real rights in a world that was otherwise dominated by the owners of the methods of industrial production, proponents of globalization strive to teach today's men and women about the benefits of unfettered capitalism. The consumer must learn to appreciate that he or she lives in a global society, a society where all benefit from the economic decisions made by multinational corporations. Perhaps the most powerful argument in favor of globalization is the idea that interaction among peoples - even economic interactions - leads ultimately to a sharing of all that is best in different cultures. The lives of individuals everywhere are improved through exposure to new ideas, to different paradigms, and to the variety of resources that the global environment provides. As Jagdish Bhagwati points out in his, in Defense of Globalization, the Nineteenth Century economist and social philosopher, John Stuart Mill observed,

T]he economical advantages of commerce are surpassed in importance by those of its effects, which are intellectual and moral. It is hardly possible to overrate the value, in the present low state of human improvement, of placing human beings in contact with persons dissimilar to themselves, and with modes of thought and action unlike those with which they are familiar. Commerce is now, what war once was, the principal source of this contact.... There is no nation which does not need to borrow from others, not merely particular arts or practices, but essential points of character in which its own type is inferior. (Bhagwati, 2004, p. 30)

According to this view, globalization benefits not just the pocketbooks of stockholders in multinational corporations, but also the ordinary citizens of every nation in the world. The more genuinely global, the international economy can be made, the freer will be the movement of goods and ideas. Opening up access to markets, resources, and personnel will ultimately lead to all the people of planet Earth sharing in the good fortune and high living standards currently enjoyed by only a fraction of the global population.

Multiple jurisdictions and conflicting regulations can cause considerable hardship for multinational corporations. Modern technology jumps national boundaries, while national laws serve to reinforce these same boundaries. Multinational corporations gain considerably by using their enormous financial resources to invest wherever it is profitable and legal to invest. They arrange their operations to take advantage of optimal conditions, even if those conditions are not to be found within the borders of their home countries. (Eden & Lenway, 2001, p. 383) as well, certain governments are more restrictive than others when it comes to offering opportunities for investment and development. Some nations have laws banning full ownership of corporate assets, land, factories, and so forth, by foreign nationals. Clearly, such restrictions hinder movement of capital and resources. Similarly, restrictive immigration policies can affect the free movement of labor from one location to another. Immigration from Mexico and other developing nations is a contentious issue in the United States precisely because a large influx of workers from these countries lowers wages for all Americans. Accustomed to much lower standards of living, citizens of developing nations are willing to work for considerably less than their counterparts in more developed regions. They will also perform jobs many Americans, Canadians, and Europeans are unwilling to take on. Frequently, these immigrants are also willing to accept inferior working conditions - even to the point of laboring in genuinely hazardous environments, and with substandard medical care, and other benefits. Nevertheless,

Executives at I.B.M. And many other companies argue that creating more jobs in lower cost locations overseas keeps their industries competitive, holds costs down for American consumers, helps to develop poorer nations while supporting overall employment in the United States by improving productivity and the nation's global reach. (Greenhouse, 22 July 2004)

By relaxing the restrictions on investment and immigration, the multinational corporations believe they can benefit populations in both the developing, and the developed worlds. To this end, these large corporations have worked toward setting up various free-trade zones, and cross-border agreements in regard to intellectual property rights.

One of the most significant of the free-trade agreements was the North American Free Trade Association, or NAFTA, as it is commonly known. NAFTA establishes, in effect, free movement of fiscal resources, natural resources, goods, and people across the American, Canadian, and Mexican borders. The belief that such an agreement would bring vast societal benefits was particularly strong in Mexico, where NAFTA was seen as a way of bringing the country up to the economic levels of the other two partners in the agreement. (Poitras, 2001, p. 18)

An influx of, mostly American, capital would bring large scale development and full employment to Mexico. The maquiladores - American-owned factories producing good for the American market, but located in Mexico - are a notable feature of post-NAFTA North America. While offer better-paying, higher-skilled… READ MORE

How to Reference "Criminal Science Conflict Theory: Marx, NAFTA" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Related Term Papers:

Theories of Criminal Behavior Discussion Chapter

Criminal Behavior Theories

Theory of Criminal Man: Renowned Italian criminologist Cesare Lombroso created theories that have not always been understood, according to professor Mary Gibson (University of New York). Basically… read more

Discussion Chapter 2 pages (771 words) Sources: 2 Topic: Crime / Police / Criminal Justice

---

Scientific Method and Forensics Science Essay

Criminal Science

Applying the Scientific Method in the Real World: From Observation to Experimentation in Criminal Forensics

The scientific method is a very useful methodology for coming to objective conclusions… read more

Essay 5 pages (1382 words) Sources: 6 Style: APA Topic: Crime / Police / Criminal Justice

---

Criminal Justice Theory Discussion Chapter

Criminal Justice Policies

Criminal Justice and Policies

M2D1: Applying Due Process and Crime Control

Habert Packer was the core founder of due process model and crime control model that aimed… read more

Discussion Chapter 5 pages (2044 words) Sources: 5 Topic: Crime / Police / Criminal Justice

---

Criminal Justice System Juvenile Delinquency Identify Three Term Paper

Criminal Justice System Juvenile Delinquency

Identify three components of the diversionary program and initiatives within the NCJRS website Woman & Girls in the Criminal Justice System.

Gender-Specific Assessment of Offender's… read more

Term Paper 3 pages (842 words) Sources: 1 Topic: Crime / Police / Criminal Justice

---

Sociological Theories Essay

conflict theory (chapter 1); social distance (chapter 1); selective perception (chapter 1); ethnocentrism (chapter 1); selective perception (chapter 1); false premises (chapter 1); cultural pluralism (chapter 1); emotional considerations (chapter… read more

Essay 3 pages (1025 words) Sources: 1 Topic: Race / Ethnic Studies / Racism

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>