Term Paper on "Felony Murder: Criminal Justice"

Term Paper 4 pages (1303 words) Sources: 3

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Criminal Justice: Felony Murder

A person is convicted of murder if it is proven, beyond reasonable doubt, that they specifically intended the death that they caused, intended to foist serious bodily injury upon their victim, or acted recklessly, with no regard for human life (Malani, 2002). The felony-murder rule, which "allows a killing that occurs in the course of a serious felony, even an accidental death, to be charged against the felon as murder," is the only exception to the proof of intent provision that governs murder convictions (LII, n.d.). It comes into operation when death occurs either during a felony or in subsequent flight from one, and there is a direct causal connection between the death, and the felony (Binder, 2002). Like any other rule in criminal punishment, the felony-murder rule was developed with one overriding intention; to deter crime by making people shy away from committing felonies. Empirical research indicates that the felony-murder rule does little to deter crime. It ought to be abolished and replaced with a more effective alternative.

The felony-murder rule began in England under the Common Law and was at the very onset applied rather strictly - encircling any killing taking place during the commission of a "felony even if the felon is not the killer" (LII, n.d.). To this end, if a security officer attempting to thwart a bank raid shot and killed one robber, the surviving one(s) was (were) charged with the murder of his (their) colleague (LII, n.d.). Most jurisdictions have since limited the scope of the rule, making it operative only when a felony is extremely dangerous, or when death is foreseeable (Binder, 2002). Some jurisdictions have abolished it altogether (Binder, 2002). Although jurisdictions that still practice the felony-murder rule have different definitions of dangerous felonies, robbery, rape, kidnapping, and burglary come out as the typical felony murder rule-invoking crimes (Malani, 2002).

Strengths and Weaknesses of the Felony-Murder Rule

Three weighty justifications have been advanced by the rule's proponents with regard to its efficacy and practicability. First and foremost, the rule literally pushes "felons to take greater care to avoid accidental deaths when committing felonies" (Malani, 2002, p. 5). Any killing, intentional or not, that occurs in the course of a felony shifts a case from felony to murder, and consequently, attracts a higher penalty. In order to avoid this, a felon would try to execute their crime more carefully, perhaps by using weapons that are less dangerous, or by having their executions planned out with greater precision (Malani, 2002). This way, the rule instills some level of fear among felons and goes a long way towards reducing the number of accidental deaths resulting from felony crimes (Malani, 2002)

In addition to inducing greater care in the execution of felonies, the felony-murder rule drives felons to adjust their criminal activities to optimal levels (Malani, 2002). This rides on the ideology that the risk of unintentional killing increases with the number of felonies; such that, for instance, a felon who commits crime every week has higher chances of unintentionally killing a victim, than one who commits crime once every three months. The only way a felon can reduce this risk is by reducing the number of crimes they commit, which would imply that the rule would naturally reduce overall felony crime levels (Binder, 2002).

The felony-murder rule not only deters unintentional killings, but intentional ones as well (Malani, 2002). The strict liability for killings concept holds felons strictly responsible for all deaths that occur during the course of their crime, and to this end, ensures that "felons cannot escape punishment for intentional killings" (Malani, 2002, p. 5). The counter-arguments have been discussed in the subsequent subsections of this text.

The rule's proponents assume that felons are aware of the rule, and hence carry out their criminal activities, with its provisions embedded at the back of their minds (Malani, 2002). This sounds unrealistic… READ MORE

How to Reference "Felony Murder: Criminal Justice" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Related Term Papers:

Criminal Procedure Term Paper

Criminal Procedure:

The criminal justice system is a process that involves various steps that start with a criminal investigation and end with the release of a convicted criminal from correctional… read more

Term Paper 4 pages (1602 words) Sources: 4 Topic: Crime / Police / Criminal Justice

---

Criminal Justice Final Research Proposal

Criminal Justice Final

Define the "traditional" crime of murder as described in 2C:11-3 (a) 1 and 2, include the two relevant forms of criminal intent or criminal state of mind.… read more

Research Proposal 7 pages (2030 words) Sources: 0 Style: MLA Topic: Crime / Police / Criminal Justice

---

Criminal Gang Enhancements Term Paper

Criminal Gang Enhancements in Sentencing

CRIMINAL GANG ENHANCEMENT

IN SENTENCING

During the time period between the years of 1997 and 1998 legislation was focused on crime and most specifically juvenile… read more

Term Paper 9 pages (3593 words) Sources: 12 Style: APA Topic: Crime / Police / Criminal Justice

---

Justice Process for Illegal Immigrants Who Commit Crimes Term Paper

Justice Process for Illegal Immigrants Who Commit Crimes

The most aggressive criminals presently are illegal aliens. However, in cities where such aliens perpetrate highest crimes, the police are not capable… read more

Term Paper 5 pages (1868 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Crime / Police / Criminal Justice

---

Does Capital Punishment Deter Murder? Thesis

Criminal justice [...] whether capital punishment deters murder or not. Capital punishment is said to be a deterrent to crime and murder, but is it really? While many studies have… read more

Thesis 6 pages (2013 words) Sources: 6 Style: APA Topic: Crime / Police / Criminal Justice

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>