Thesis on "Real Estate Eminent Domain"

Home  >  Topics  >  Law My Account

Thesis 9 pages (2921 words) Sources: 10 Style: MLA

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Constitutional Law: Real Estate Eminent Domain in Los Angeles, California

The objective of this work is to find one legal case from which an eminent domain event occurred in Los Angeles, California, within the past five years. Furthermore, this work will locate two articles that are no more than one-year-old that directly relate to this topic. This work will critically analyze the legal case and current event.

Eminent Domain is defined as the power held by a government, either federal, state, country or city and to include school and hospital district and other agency to secure private land for public use and this may be with or even without the permission or approval of the owner of the property. It is provided in the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution that 'private property [may not] be taken for public use without just compensation.' Added by the Fourteenth Amendment is the requirement of 'just compensation' when property is taken and involves a condemnation which includes a public need declaration, next followed by an appraisal, offer and negotiation. In the even the individual whose property is taken is not satisfied they may sue the government agency and have a court determine what is 'just' compensation. Eminent domain in Los Angeles, California is the focus of this review of case law and literature, which reports eminent domain in Los Angeles, California. The Constitution of California allows governments to seize property through the principle of eminent domain and makes requirements that property only be taken in this manner for 'public use' and through 'just compensation' to the property owner. The work of Sanderfur (nd) entitled: "A Natural Rights Perspective on E
Continue scrolling to

download full paper
minent Domain in California: A Rationale for Meaningful Judicial Scrutiny of 'Public Use' states that the term "eminent domain appears to have been coined by the sixteenth century author Hugo Grotius, although the power itself is much older." (Sanderfur, nd) the work of Boulard entitled: "Eminent Domain- for the Greater Good?" relates that the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Kelo v. New London has prompted states to look at their own eminent domain practices." (2006)

I. The ISSUE

The work of Saito (2007) entitled: "Economic Redevelopment and the Community Benefits Program: A Case Study of the L.A. Live Project, a Los Angeles Sports and Entertainment District" states that discussions concerning the development of the corporation Anschutz Entertainment Group (AEG) and Los Angeles City which revolved around the building of a sports arena in downtown Los Angeles began in 1996. Saito (2007) states that in August 1997, a council member, Joel Wachs, "declared that he would launch a voter initiative 'requiring an election before any professional sports facility could receive a public subsidy" and Wachs did file this with the city clerk and explained that while he was in support of the arena he was "against public funding and wanted fuller disclosure about the financial dealings of the project."(Saito, 2007)

Saito states that the officials in Los Angeles desired to receive the huge capital investment in the downtown area "represented by the Staples project" and help was needed from the city by AEG "in the form of eminent domain to assemble the huge parcel of land required by the Staples Center and the future L.A. Live project; city subsidies for the project, and support through the long and complicated approval process for the project." (Saito, 2007) in October 1997, two months following the filing of Wach's initiative with the city clerk a deal was agreed upon between the city and the developer on a deal for the arena that was a new agreement that was stated by Wachs to be of the nature that would result in a $100 million savings for the city. However, "the spokesperson for the arena said the deal would cost the developer additional 'tens of millions'. (Saito, 2007)

The Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency "used its power of eminent domain and assembled a parcel of land for the development of the arena. The arena would be called the Staples Center when Staples Inc. agreed in 1997 to a $116 million 20-year deal to have its name on the arena, up to that time, the most ever paid for the naming rights for a sports arena." (Saito, 2007) This arena would replace approximately 184 housing units as well as 28 businesses and the Los Angeles Unified School District Child Care Facility.

II. LOS ANGELES: CASES of EMINENT DOMAIN

The Los Angeles Times article entitled: "L.A. Unified Wins Eminent Domain Claim" reports a win for the Los Angeles Unified School District "in a legal battle with developer Richard Meruelo over the fate of a former rail yard." (Larrubia, 2007) it was fueled by Superior Court Judge Soussan Burguera that "the district had a right to take the 230 acres Glassell Park property from Meruelo through eminent domain." (Larrubia, 2007) Being built is a new 2,300-student high school, which is expected to alleviate the crowding at three other high schools in Los Angeles. It is stated that now that the fight is over concerning the property rights that the question of compensation is next. Meruelo was offered $29 million by the district however, Meruelo paid a stated "$30 million for the parcel in 2005 - a rising real estate market..." according to Meruelo's lawyer, Patrick a. Hennessey. It is held by Hennessey that the District never made a fair evaluation of the land. It is reported that the purchase of the property on the part of Meruelo is "controversial, in part, because the district also was negotiating for the property and had made an offer." (Larrubia, 2007)

The funding source is also stated to have been controversial in that "he tapped a credit line with the public employees' retirement fund, CalPERS - which includes nonclassroom L.A. Unified workers- to buy the vacant lot north of downtown." (Larrubia, 2007) the claim stated by Meruelo is that he wasn't aware of the district's plans when he bought the land and even made an offer to build a school integrated into his own plans and in what would be a placement of the school in a "small adjacent lot that he did not own." (Larrubia, 2007) Complicating the matter of valuation of the property is the additional purchases made by Meruelo of "adjacent properties - a Kia car dealership and a FedEx property." (Larrubia, 2007)

Eminent domain is not always the outcome of personal vs. governmental property disputes and this is evidenced in the battle for South Central Farm in Los Angeles. The work of Mark (2006) entitled: "The Central Question" states that South Central Farm is "Situated among the warehouses, railroad tracks, and truck depots of industrial Los Angeles, South Central Farm is something of an oasis, and it's become a vital food source for 350 low-income, mostly Latino families. Over the last few weeks, the threat of development has earned these 14 acres -- which comprise the nation's largest urban garden -- national and international attention." (Mark, 2006)

This property dispute has been ongoing for more than twenty years and has been in and out of court over and again. The property is stated to be: "...about a 15-minute drive from downtown L.A., is owned by Brentwood developer Ralph Horowitz. In the late 1980s, the city used eminent domain to take it over for a planned waste incinerator. Horowitz's investment company, which owned 80% of the property at the time, received $4.7 million after filing a lawsuit. Neighbors organized to stop the incinerator, but the site then became an illegal dump full of unwanted furniture and appliances." (Mark, 2006)

In 1992, the L.A. Regional Food Bank was assigned a temporary lease by city official and the land was turned into a community garden. Much work has been done including the installation of a water system. Mark (2006) states that finally in 2003 '...after years of wrangling and lawsuits by Horowitz -- who had retained the right of first refusal on the land -- the city council voted in a closed session to sell the property back to him for $5.5 million. The next month, the South Central farmers received their first eviction notice, and they've been fighting to save their plots ever since." (Mark, 2006) the work of the GAO entitled: "Eminent Domain: Information about Its Uses and Effect on Property Owners and Communities is Limited (2006) states that complexities exist in association land assembly and that these have "...led to numerous approaches for acquiring land and providing just compensation." (GAO, 2006) the land acquisition process generally occurs in four stages: (1) project planning; (2) property valuation; (3) property acquisition; and (4) relocation. (GAO, 2006) it is stated by the GAO in its Congressional Report that while few eminent domain cases actually proceed to a jury trial "authority officials stated that eminent domain is the most effective tool they have to acquire needed property from owners who hold out for a higher purchase price or refuse to sell."(GAO, 2006) it is additionally related… READ MORE

Quoted Instructions for "Real Estate Eminent Domain" Assignment:

Please write a 9-page paper on the topic of Eminent Domain in LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA. Specifically, here are my requirements:

- 9 pages, inclusive of a table of contents page

- Purpose of the paper: To find 1 legal case from which an eminent domain event occurred in LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, preferably within the past 5 years. Also find 2 recent articles (within the past 1 year) that directly relate to the topic. The article can be a Law review or law journal, or a newspaper article from an accredited business journal or newspaper. Critically analyze the legal case and current event (from the article) with the following outline below.

- My preferences for a topic: Try to find a legal case that involves the economic development project that built the Staples Center complex in downtown Los Angeles. (Please DO NOT use the case Kelo v. City of New London. That is a landmark case that should just be cited within the essay but not as the main case to be discussed). Find this case from the Lexis/Nexus database.

Outline

The table of contents page should be written logically, but should include the following:

1)issue (eminent domain / property rights for owners in California);

2) cite 1 legal case in the past 5 years;

3) cite 2 recent articles that talk about events that are related to the legal cases cited;

4) explain the facts of the case and recent article case;

5)explain the judicial opinion(what the judge had to decide);

6) explain the Rule of Law (what specific constitutional law does the case refer to and what other related federal laws or statutes);

7) ANALYSIS: Application of the law mentioned in #6; and what was the Dissenting opinion (from opposing judges or appelate court;

8) Other legal cases cited or recent eminent domain issues in california; for example: Reverse eminent domain - name a legal case where the opposite happened and how it affected the public.

9) Ethical dilemmas arising - in blight communities, what happens to the disadvantaged persons living in and around the area? Where should cities house the disadvantaged who are perhaps "pushed" out of the area b/c of the new development? (this probably happened in the downtown Los Angeles area). Is there a gov't policy in place that protects the lives of non-property owners who are not provided with alternative dwellings?

10) Conclusion - this should be an OPINIOIN about whether or not eminent domain is a fair policy (in California). Make the argument that it IS a fair policy, however, make the recommendation that the Constitution (or California statute) should be amended to make the law stricter, restricting the gov't from abuses of eminent domain. The gov't should not have so much discretion in exercising eminent domain.

Other things to consider for the paper:

- define "eminent domain"

- define the Fifth Amendment that refers to the constitutional rights and protections of property owners

- cite the landmark eminent domain case: Kelo v. City of New London (but do not use this as the main case to be discussed

- refer to the CURRENT Proposition 98 and 99 (relate it to how the upcoming presidential candidates are siding on each side of the issue)

- use at least 5 quotations from the articles or legal cases, and use footnotes where applicable

- use clear and and concise language, referencing the sources cited

*****

How to Reference "Real Estate Eminent Domain" Thesis in a Bibliography

Real Estate Eminent Domain.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2008, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/constitutional-law-real-estate-eminent/58499. Accessed 3 Jul 2024.

Real Estate Eminent Domain (2008). Retrieved from https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/constitutional-law-real-estate-eminent/58499
A1-TermPaper.com. (2008). Real Estate Eminent Domain. [online] Available at: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/constitutional-law-real-estate-eminent/58499 [Accessed 3 Jul, 2024].
”Real Estate Eminent Domain” 2008. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/constitutional-law-real-estate-eminent/58499.
”Real Estate Eminent Domain” A1-TermPaper.com, Last modified 2024. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/constitutional-law-real-estate-eminent/58499.
[1] ”Real Estate Eminent Domain”, A1-TermPaper.com, 2008. [Online]. Available: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/constitutional-law-real-estate-eminent/58499. [Accessed: 3-Jul-2024].
1. Real Estate Eminent Domain [Internet]. A1-TermPaper.com. 2008 [cited 3 July 2024]. Available from: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/constitutional-law-real-estate-eminent/58499
1. Real Estate Eminent Domain. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/constitutional-law-real-estate-eminent/58499. Published 2008. Accessed July 3, 2024.

Related Thesis Papers:

Kelo Eminent Domain: Was the Kelo Decision Term Paper

Paper Icon

Kelo

Eminent Domain: Was the Kelo Decision Fair?

In 1954 the Supreme Court ruled in Berman v. Parker that government's power of eminent domain could be used to seize property… read more

Term Paper 10 pages (2707 words) Sources: 4 Topic: Law / Legal / Jurisprudence


Real Estate Law Essay

Paper Icon

U.S. legislation: Foreclosure relief

economy may be improving and shedding fewer jobs, but that is little comfort for Americans in danger of losing their homes. At the end of September… read more

Essay 2 pages (645 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Economics / Finance / Banking


Low Income Housing Thesis

Paper Icon

Low Income Housing Initiatives in Brazil and China

Two giant countries that are well poised to become major players in an increasingly globalized marketplace in the future are China and… read more

Thesis 10 pages (3141 words) Sources: 10 Style: APA Topic: Urban Studies / City Planning / Housing


Conflict Between Democracy and Bureaucracy Term Paper

Paper Icon

Democracy Is Better Than Bureaucracy

Democracy is defined by Webster's New World Dictionary as "government by the people, either directly or through elected representatives, 2) a country, state, etc. with… read more

Term Paper 4 pages (1495 words) Sources: 2 Topic: Government / Politics


Sociology History of Business Science Research Proposal

Paper Icon

Delimitations

Today, modern business systems help an increasingly globalized world function in seamless ways. In fact, English is rapidly becoming the lingua franca of the business world and transnational borders… read more

Research Proposal 75 pages (20751 words) Sources: 20 Topic: Business / Corporations / E-commerce


Wed, Jul 3, 2024

If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!

Established in 1995
900,000 Orders Finished
100% Guaranteed Work
300 Words Per Page
Simple Ordering
100% Private & Secure

We can write a new, 100% unique paper!

Search Papers

Navigation

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!