Term Paper on "Consequentialism Faces a Number of Objections"

Term Paper 13 pages (3490 words) Sources: 8 Style: Harvard

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Consequentialism faces a number of objections. Which are the most serious, and do they render the theory unsuitable as a guide to criminal justice practice?

Substantive moral theories in modern philosophical discourse typically fall into the categories of consequentialist or deontological. Consequentialist theories, which derives from the ethos of utilitarianism, state that, "...agents must always act so as to produce the best available outcomes overall" (Scheffler S. review). In contrast to this position, deontological moral theories stress that the best overall outcomes are not of primacy significance. In the context of modern philosophical and moral theory, it is generally acknowledged that the consequentialist view is inadequate in terms of a comprehensive and inclusive moral theory.

The following discussion will attempt to provide an overview of consequentialism. The discussion will be focused on the literature and views that relate to the central and most important objections to this philosophical and theoretical stance. Thirdly, the discussion of these objections to consequentialism will be related to the context of criminal justice practice. This aspect will be borne in mind throughout the following sections and an assessment will be made at the end of the study with regard to the extent to which this moral philosophical perspective is relevant to modern criminal jurisprudence.

The central thesis or claim of this paper is, in the first instance, that the philosophical stance of consequentialism is not adequate to deal with the complexity of moral issues and especially not adequate or entirely appropriate in terms of the criminal justice system. Secondly, on the other hand it is also realized that this the theory of consequentialism does have certain validity in the legal and criminal context and that it cannot be rejected out of hand. Cconsequentialist or deontological thinking both plays a role in moral theory and by implication in criminal justice. However, it will be suggested that a combination or integration of the two theories is something that should be worked towards in order to retain the best elements of both ideological trajectories.

2. Overview of the philosophy of consequentialism

In essence, consequentialism refers to those moral theories that have as their central tenet the view that the moral judgment of any action is firmly based on the consequence of that particular action. From this perspective and frame of reference, moral actions are not intrinsically or innately moral, but are rather those actions that produce good consequences. Of course, this view immediately raises a number of rather obvious but important issues - such as the assessment of what "good" consequences are and who determines this aspect. This is a component of the argument that will be further expanded on in the idea of value neutrality and value relativity in the following sections. In contrast to consequentialist conceptions, "...standard deontological views maintain that it is sometimes wrong to do what will produce the best available outcome overall" (Scheffler 1994, p. 2).

The term "consequentialism" was first used by G.E.M. Anscombe in the essay "Modern Moral Philosophy" in 1958. (Defining consequentialism) www.informationdelight.info/encyclopedia/entry/Consequentialism" it has subsequently become a common theoretical term in contemporary moral philosophy. Importantly, it is also aligned to the utilitarian moral theories put forward by John Stuart Mill.

The defining characteristic or feature of consequentialist moral theories is the fact that normative weight of importance is given to the consequence of any actions and that this normative weighting is a determining factor in ascertaining the moral right or wrong of any action. The following is a more comprehensive and insightful summary of the core meaning of the term.

Consequentialism is the view that morality is all about producing the right kinds of overall consequences. Here the phrase "overall consequences" of an action means everything the action brings about, including the action itself. For example, if you think that the whole point of morality is (a) to spread happiness and relieve suffering, or (b) to create as much freedom as possible in the world, or - to promote the survival of our species, then you accept consequentialism.

Consequentialism: The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

In more philosophical terms consequentialism therefore views a moral act or rather the moral 'rightness' of any action in terms of the consequences of the act. Furthermore, "...an act is morally right depends only on the consequences of that act or of something related to that act, such as the motive behind the act or a general rule requiring acts of the same kind" (Consequentialism). An essential aspect that has to be taken into account in this philosophical stance is that normative properties are seen to be dependent on their consequences. The acceptance of this basic assumption is what makes the theory consequentialist.

Another aspect that is brought into play in this theory is the aspect of agent - neutrality. In other words, formal and strict consequentialist theory assumes a stance of agent neutrality and the focus is only on the consequence of the actions. This is an aspect of the theory that has created dissent and is often used by critics to argue against the theory. This aspect will be expanded on in the following section on the objections to consequentialism.

It must also be noted that there are various types or variations of strict, formal consequentialism. For instance, Plain Consequentialism in its moral context is described as follows, "Of all the things a person might do at any given moment, the morally right action is the one with the best overall consequences" (Consequentialism: The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy). For example, if happiness is seen as the highest good then it follows that from the consequentialist perspective right or moral actions are those which create or causes the highest degree of happiness. (Consequentialism: The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

Another variation of consequentialist theory is known as Plain Scalar Consequentialism. This is described as," of any two things a person might do at any given moment, one is better than another to the extent that the its overall consequences are better than the other's overall consequences." (Consequentialism: The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy). This view therefore allows for degrees of moral correctness.

There are many other variations of this philosophical and theoretical stance. These include Expectable Consequentialism and Rule Consequentialism. Rule Consequentialism is worth noting as it relates to a form of this theory which places community and group good over the individual; which is also one of the central objections to consequentialism. This form of consequentialism refers to;

An action is morally right if and only if it does not violate the set of rules of behavior whose general acceptance in the community would have the best consequences -- that is, at least as good as any rival set of rules or no rules at all. (Consequentialism: The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

However, an in-depth discussion of these different varieties of consequentialism would take us too far from the central thesis of this paper.. Therefore, the position adopted by Scheffler in his book, the Rejection of Consequentialism: A Philosophical Investigation of the Considerations Underlying Rival Moral Conceptions, is the approach that will be taken in discussion of the objections to consequentialism. He states that," I will not be discussing these other variants of consequentialism... Although I believe that my main lines of argument could be modified to cover them, the only kind of consequentialism that I will actually consider in the book is act-consequentialism. (Scheffler 1994, p. 2)

Objections to the theory of consequentialism

One of the central objections to the theory of consequentialism is that it misses the entire point of morality and the application of ethical theory in the service of legal and civil agencies. This view states simply that it is not the consequences of actions but rather the innate value of these actions that quality them as moral or immoral. In other words, the emphasis from this opposing point-of-view is on intention rather than on outcomes in assessing moral quality. This view is more fully described as follows. "Various nonconsequentialist views are that morality is all about doing one's duty, respecting rights, obeying nature, obeying God, obeying one's own heart, actualizing one's own potential, being reasonable, respecting all people, or not interfering with others -- no matter the consequences"(Consequentialism: The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy).

The above view leads to a number of different arguments against the outcomes based thesis of consequentialism. One of the most commonly stated objections is that in certain cases in the application of this theory it would mean that individuals have to be sacrificed for the common good or the best outcomes or consequences. As Lawlor (2004) states, the consequentialist view implies that "...in certain situations, we would be able to maximize well-being by sacrificing or scapegoating an innocent individual" (Lawlor, 2004). Lawlor provides the following telling example of a classic objection to the theory of consequentialist the sheriff of a town frames and executes an innocent man in order to appease an angry mob that is demanding justice. The objection states that the consequentialist is committed… READ MORE

How to Reference "Consequentialism Faces a Number of Objections" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Related Term Papers:

Pharmacist.In This Case, Case Study

pharmacist."In this case, the pharmacist is faced with a moral and ethical dilemma of informing one Mr. Ramirez's (a congestive heart failure patient) doctor, the risks that he might be… read more

Case Study 5 pages (1583 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Medicine / Pharmacy

---

Morality and the Professional Life Values at Work Research Paper

resolution of problems involving conflicting moral and nonmoral values presents a real dilemma to the individual tasked with solving such a case. It is therefore critical that an appropriate decision-making… read more

Research Paper 4 pages (1035 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Career / Labor / Human Resources

---

William Shaw and Thomas Nagel Deontological Constraints Research Paper

William Shaw and Thomas Nagle

Over the years, there have been a number of different ethical theories introduced, that have challenged the way society will view, the most appropriate activities… read more

Research Paper 3 pages (1007 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Ethics / Morality

---

Personal Values Development Current Value Positions Religion Essay

Personal Values Development

Current Value Positions

Religion

I believe that there is a kernel of social value at the center of most contemporary religions in my social culture. On the… read more

Essay 5 pages (1483 words) Sources: 3 Style: APA Topic: Sexuality / Gender

---

Legal Environment of Business Term Paper

Legal Business Environment

Legal Environment of Business

Modern businesses have to operate under a variety of laws and regulations. The business manger has to ensure that all federal and state… read more

Term Paper 10 pages (2863 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Law / Legal / Jurisprudence

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>