Essay on "Is Competition Always Necessarily Beneficial to Consumers?"

Essay 5 pages (1479 words) Sources: 5 Style: Harvard

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Competition

Orthodox economic thought holds that competition is inherently better than monopoly in the provision of goods and services. There are a number of reasons why competition is cited as being superior -- improved innovation, price competition, competition for talent, and the use of features and service to deliver superior goods and services to consumers. This paper will show that the benefits of competition, when compared against a public monopoly, are not universal. There are instances where competition is not superior to a monopoly.

Monopolies

Economic orthodoxy holds that monopolies are inferior in many, if not all respects, to a competitive marketplace. This view, however, is based on the idea of the private industry monopoly, and is erroneously ascribed with universality to the public (government) monopoly. Private monopolies are deemed to be inferior because without competition they have no incentive to innovate, no incentive to provide a reasonable level of customer service and they can charge whatever the market will bear for their prices and service. Thus, the price, service and innovation that a monopoly will deliver will be the bare minimum needed to keep demand at a profitable level for goods with higher elasticity. For goods with lower elasticity, price gouging is a more likely outcome of a monopoly condition.

Government monopolies have generally been ascribed the same characteristics are corporate monopolies. This is a false comparison, however, as government monopolies are subject to unique operating conditions. The first of these is the government monopoly is not necessarily operating with a profit motive. This is in stark contrast to a corporate monopoly. A quick analysis of different government monopolies shows a range of motives where income is concerned. Many government health care arms are subsidized by government and provide services with very little revenue component. Others seek to break even, setting prices at the level that allows them to meet public demand without taking excess profits. Others seek to earn profits for the government, feeding their revenues back to the general coffers. Only the last behave as corporations do, engaging in price gouging and abuse of their monopoly position. The others exist for other motives, usually the provision of public goods.

That the two types of monopolies would have different objectives leads to different behaviors in the market. Monopolies not seeking undue profit are therefore able - and in many cases willing -- to offer lower prices than they could offer. Thus, they are not behaving with economic rationality. A firm that does not behave rationally cannot reasonably be compared with the orthodox monopoly, which does behave rationally. Studies comparing government and private insurance companies in Europe have noted that the government insurance companies offer a lower price than do the private ones (Ungern, 1996; Epple, 1996; Felder, 1996)

Beyond price, government monopolies are less likely to innovate than are competitive companies. They have no economic incentive to do so, but they may emulate innovations from elsewhere if they feel that the public will be better served. While the orthodox view holds that monopolies will deliver poorer service levels, there is a tradeoff here that needs to be considered. In a competitive market, firms will seek to deliver the most efficient service level, unless they are making service a point of differentiation. The government monopoly firm need not worry about cost effectiveness and can throw money at service levels, especially if the monopoly is a revenue-generator. Even with efficiency, governments have budgets and the people that run governments are arguably more accountable than corporate leaders, since they must run for election. This implies that at least a reasonable level of efficiency can be expected from government-run corporations. This contrasts with the orthodox mentality, but that mentality is based on the flawed assumption that there is no accountability in government and state-run companies will run into deficit just because they can. Both are hypotheticals, neither is necessarily true.

Competition

The role that competition plays in a market is to lower prices, improve innovation and improve efficiency. Firms in a state of monopolistic competition must do something to differentiate from competitors in order to earn profit, and this drives them into a process of constant improvement. As a result, the logic goes, competition is inherently better. But in the real world, this depends on the particular industry characteristics. The insurance examples in Europe are a good example to use here.

The insurance markets described in those studies are mature, and… READ MORE

How to Reference "Is Competition Always Necessarily Beneficial to Consumers?" Essay in a Bibliography

Related Essays:

Evaluating the Chosen Companies Dissertation

Competition Between McDonald's, Burger King, and Wendy's: The Finances of Fast Food

The following research proposal demonstrates the need for achieving greater consistency, accuracy, and reliability in the financial assessment… read more

Dissertation 36 pages (9987 words) Sources: 30 Topic: Economics / Finance / Banking

---

Egypt Is Going Dissertation

Egypt is going to take in order to secure its interest in the Nile waters and in the Nile Basin countries, especially after the change of regime and the uprising… read more

Dissertation 36 pages (9929 words) Sources: 30 Topic: Israel / Palestine / Arab World

---

World Poor Thesis

aloud or in writing, making the reflective report exercise a valuable addition to the learning process. This reflective report recounts the events that took place during the research process for… read more

Thesis 55 pages (17261 words) Sources: 3 Topic: Business / Corporations / E-commerce

---

Sports Endorsement Sports Celebrity and Product Research Proposal

Sports Endorsement

Sports Celebrity and Product Endorsement From a Consumer Perspective

Marketing as a science and as an art form relies heavily upon impression building, an understanding of the psychology… read more

Research Proposal 34 pages (8783 words) Sources: 1+ Style: Harvard Topic: Advertising / Marketing / Sales

---

Business of Education Term Paper

for-Profit Education vs. Non-Profit Education

RESEARCH on for-PROFIT SCHOOLS and UNIVERSITIES

RESEARCH on NON-PROFIT PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES

GLOBAL EDUCATIONAL STATUS

SAMPLING

SAMPLIING FRAME

METHOD of SELECTING the SAMPLE ELEMENTS

SCALE DEVELOPMENT… read more

Term Paper 60 pages (17404 words) Sources: 7 Style: APA Topic: Education / Teaching / Learning

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>