Methodology Chapter on "Color of Stigma "Measuring the Grief Experiences"
Methodology Chapter 18 pages (7498 words) Sources: 15 Style: APA
[EXCERPT] . . . .
As well, there are five covariates: family history of suicide, relationship status, depression, age, and mother's socioeconomic status. Using the methodology of Judd & Kenny (2010) and that of Faul et al. (2007), sample determination for the study, using multiple regression, indicates significant power at 0.80 and a medium effect size of ?2 = 0.15 and significance set at p < 0.05. Thus, the sample size was set at N = 92.Variables/Instruments
Surveys described below were used for measurements of the variables. Alignment with the constructs of the study was used for selection.
Independent Variable 1: Suicide as Perceived Stigma.
Fiegelberg and colleagues (2011) outline a Suicide Stigmatization Scale that is used in this work to determine the extent to which mothers of a son who committed suicide perceived that they have been 'stigmatized'. The SSS instrument is comprised of two assessments: (a) an 11-item sub-scale that addresses social harm and/or help as well as family harm and/or help; and (b) an 11-item subscale that addresses social and family strain (Fiegelman et al., 2011).
For this study, subscale questions for harm/help are coded as follows: 1 = harmful/very harmful; 0 = no effect/not harmful. Subscale questions for strain are coded as follows: 1 = became strained/weaker; 0 = not applicable/remained the same, or became closer/stronger. Subsequently, the SSS scale of 22 questions is computed by summing the two subscales. The resulting ratio ranges from 0 to 22, with lower scores indicating non-strained relationships.
According to Jordan (2012), Feigelman et al. (2011), and F
Continue scrolling to
eigelman & Feigelman (2011), the inter-item reliability for the SSS scale is good, with Cronbach's alpha in the mid 0.70s to mid 0.80s, and good 2-week test-retest reliability, with rs = 0.50s, ps <download full paper ⤓