Term Paper on "Children Sociology Theorizing Childhood Power"

Term Paper 7 pages (2510 words) Sources: 1+

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Children Sociology

Child abuse is not an anomaly but part of the structural oppression of children. Assault and exploitation are risks inherent to 'childhood' as it is currently lived. It is not just the abuse of power over children that is the problem but the existence and maintenance of that power itself" (Kitzinger, 1997: 168). The power of the adults over children, given by their social statute, gained by criteria of age (meaning life experience= they know what is best for children) is used sometimes as an excuse of the children abuses.

The last century was significant for the development of children and childhood concept. Protecting the child has become an international rule, so that all the social institutions were forced to change their view (legally and practically) about the children's position in the adult life.

In the past, children's rights were very limited, almost inexistent, we can say, but no one bothered to spend a look and do some research about the social cause of this fact from the children's point-of-view, the adult perspective being an easier way out. "Children were typically treated as "dependent variables" of various categories of adults, professionals and institutions that "have" children, take care of them, work with them, are responsible for organizing their living conditions, or in any other way relate to them. Consequently children were looked upon from the viewpoints of adults, agencies and institutions" (Alanen, 2004: 2). After many debates and critics regarding negligence, discrimination and repression over children, a new perspective came into light, treating them as an integrant part of the social process. But a problem
Continue scrolling to

download full paper
still remained, as "the perspective to children provided by "socialization" is, moreover, also inherently adultist, as it brings children into view from the singular viewpoint of adults and adult society" (Alanen, 2004: 3)

The socialization theory includes children into the social life like a separate subject, placing them in the center of the studies. This model is elaborated after the idea of a child who has to develop in his own life the rules of the adult society. He will be a part of it only after achieving all these information. Children are not just objects, but active contributors, influenced by the society and influencing it, at their turn (James, Janks & Prout, 1998).

As an observation to this theory, Alanen says that it "must avoid the conventional view of children as objects and victims, granting them instead the status of participants and constructors in the process that make up their, and our world" (Alanen, 1990: 26).

This theoretical concept of "power" has developed as a critique to the adult ideological perspective. According to this theory, children can and do act in the social life, being part of all the social processes, in the cultural, political or the economical life. (Mason, Jan and Steadman, B., 1996)

Kitzinger is treating this issue from a different perspective, that of the children who, because of the misinterpreted concept of innocence, have to use all their resources for resisting the adult attacks on them. The vulnerability of children is seen as an outcome of the childhood institution. In his opinion, the innocence concept was used "to incite public revulsion against sexual abuse," and he founded "three main reasons" for this situation (Kitzinger, 1997: 168).

The first argument is that "the notion of childhood innocence is in itself a source of titillation for abusers" (Kitzinger, 1997: 168). Because of the media publicity, where the innocence has become a promoting image of sexuality, people's view of the child's purity changed into a view of a sexual mature child, who can easily become a "sexual object" in the eyes of the abusers.

Another reason is that "innocence is a double-edged sword in the fight against sexual abuse because it stigmatizes the 'knowing' child" (Kitzinger, 1997: 168). Children innocence concept is based on some strict criteria, which have to be respected in order to consider the children keeper of this innocence, absolutely excluding the ones who don't act according to these norms. If "the girl drinks, smokes and often fails to do her homework on time" (Daily Mail, 14.12.85), all this magic created based on the innocence of childhood disappears. A more than correct observation is included by Kitzinger: 'the sexually victimized child may be viewed neither as a child nor as an adult but rather as a piece of "damaged goods" lacking the attributes of both childhood and adult...sexually; victimized children may become "walking invitations" (Sgroi, 1982:114). A child who has been already a victim of an abuse can easily become, without the help and protection needed, a regular victim of the same abuser or the victim or other abusers. Once lost the statute of purity, the view over a child is changed completely.

The most important argument is "that it is an ideology used to deny children access to knowledge and power and hence actually increases their vulnerability to abuse" (Kitzinger, 1997: 169). This exclusion from information and the promotion of ignorance are transforming the children into easy captures of the abuse and its consequences. Instead of informing the children about the incest and the other types of abuse that can be a way of preventing the future abuse attempts on them, people use children innocence as an excuse to this ignorance.

The victims of an abuse are seen as passive objects, as pathetic and helpless beings who are only the result of the abuse, without considering their participation to the act of the abuse. Kitzinger calls this concept "the passive victim" (Kitzinger, 1997: 170). but, at a closer look, the things are totally different. An abuse is traumatic to any age category, but abused children have to grow up with this trauma and learning to develop their personality as human beings, sometimes at the same tie with the abuse that happened or is still happening in their life. They have to find different ways to survive abuses, because most of the time, they are on their own. Their methods can be physical, using accidents made on purpose on their own body or physic power, like: "they induced nose bleeds, held their breath until they fainted, or had various 'accidents' to ensure they could not be sent off on their access visit with daddy or be left alone with the abusive babysitter. They also tried barricading their bedrooms, fleeing and hiding"(Kitzinger,1997: 170). There are other ways, too, like: the image transformations, the attempt to make themselves less attractive for the abusers or physically, taking their mind somewhere else from the place and time of the abuse or erasing it from the memory.

Other interesting aspect would be the situation in which the children consider the abuse as a payment for their need of attention and affectivity or for gaining some extra rights as children.

With the argument that "children are constantly acting to preempt, evade, or modify sexual violence" (Kitzinger, 1997: 170), it can be said that, according more attention to the interpretation of children over the act of abuse can get us a new concept for the abused children, opposed to "power" concept, the "resistance" concept: "in recognizing the political oppression of children (on the basis of age and of gender, race, class and disability), a radical approach would also recognize children as resisters to those oppressions" (Kitzinger, 1997: 183).

Today there is a lot of publicity for the child abuse prevention, based on their power to prevent and stop these oppressions, giving children all kinds of solutions to actually fight against it. Sometimes these can be successful, but this is not a general rule, because these methods are not addressed to all the children, but to some social groups of children. The erroneous effect of these actions is the guilt that remains after an unstoppable abuse is consumed, that can persist longer than the trauma of the child, even when he is passing into the adult life. If the child was taught to use a mean of defense that he was not able to sustain, he will probably take one part (bigger or smaller) of blame on him, asking himself which of his actions was wrong and how he could have stopped the abuse. There are many questions, hard or impossible to solve, that can rise from a situation like this.

That is why Kitzinger is blaming the empowerment of children, considering their "resistance" more important in front of an abuse and giving children alternatives. It is vital for a child to know that he can survive an abuse if it cannot be stopped. Of course there are ways of prevention of an abuse, and the main one is information, but unfortunately abuse still happen and will happen. That is why it is important that every abused child finds his own way in dealing with the abuse and helping him to survive the trauma and fight for his right to live a normal childhood.

James, Jenks and Prout (1998), point out the four major sociological theories of… READ MORE

Quoted Instructions for "Children Sociology Theorizing Childhood Power" Assignment:

TOPIC QUESTION:

Power and Resistance

‘in recognizing the political oppression of children (on the basis of age and of gender, race, class and disability), a radical approach would also recognize children as resisters to those oppression’ (Kitzinger, 1996: 176).

Why does Kitzinger use the concept of resistance rather than empowerment?

References to REVIEW and MUST include:

Kitzinger, J. “Who Are You Kidding? Children, Power, and the Struggle Against Sexual Abuse” in A. James and A. Prout (eds), Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood, The Falmer Press, London, 1996, pp.157-183.

James, Jenks & Prout (1998). Theorizing childhood. Cambridge: Polity Press, especially chapter 8.

MacKenzie, I. ‘Power’; Ashe, ‘The Subject’; and Lloyd, ‘The Body’ in Ashe and others (1999). Contemporary Social and Political Theory: An introduction. Buckingham: Open University Press.

The focus is on the power structure which gives adults power over children. A discussion of the theories about children's place in the social world together with an analysis of the social institutions that influence how children live their childhoods.

This is not a paper about research, you are expected to 'research' the topic, in the sense of finding relevant material to discuss the theoretical issues. Relevant material will discuss 'theories', not 'findings'. It is a paper about sociological theory. About how recent sociological theory has treated the concept child. So, you start by identifying the theoretical concepts used, and the explanatory framework these concepts are drawn from. For instance, 'discourse' is a theoretical concept, drawn from poststructuralism; 'childhood innocence' is a theoretical concept associated with the socialisation framework (functionalism/developmental approach). 'Power' and 'resistance' are theoretical concepts which form part of the conflict perspective.

The theoretical issues raised in the articles considered at the beginning of the subject, especially the paper by Alanen (1990), 'Rethinking Socialization, the Family and Childhood'.

At the conclusion of the paper, Alanen wrote:

'a sociology of childhood .... must avoid the conventional view of children as objects and victims, granting them instead the status of participants and constructors in the processes that make up their, and our, world' (Alanen, 1990:26)

In other words, a good sociology of childhood will place children at the centre of theorising. Unlike the sociology of the past which treated the institutions in which children live their lives as being the theoretical focus, sociology of children has as its central interest the actions, interactions, negotiations, resistance and structural position of children.

James, Jenks and Prout (1998) categorise and review the major theoretical frameworks that have put children at the centre of theorising. These are the 'social structural child' (a theoretical approach which uses structural and demographic data to discover children's position in various societies); the 'minority group child' (a theoretical approach which treats children as a minority group, rather like ethnic minority groups, or women); the 'tribal child' (a theoretical approach which treats children as having their own culture separate from adult culture); and the 'socially constructed child' (which challenges the concept of an 'essential' childhood by exploring how childhood varies over time and between cultures). use these categories to sort out the various arguments.

The reference James, Jenks and Prout talks about the child and refers to the social world in the context of past, present and future. Jenks in particular in his analysis of childhood is associated with experiences of the topics we have covered already, the social construction of the child, the educational experience ; of which is crossing over with other disciplines like psychology. There is also four main themes structure and agency, identity and difference, continuity and change , local and global. Actually there is a diagram on page 206, figure two. Is the type of comparisons to make, and draw on different sociological approaches?

Alanen, *****a (1990). “Rethinking Socialization, the Family and Childhood’ in Patricia Adler and Peter Adler (eds), Sociologocial Studies of Child Development, JAI Press Inc, London, 1990,Vol.3, pp.13-28.

Kitzinger, J. “Who Are You Kidding? Children, Power, and the Struggle Against Sexual Abuse” in A. James and A. Prout (eds), Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood, The Falmer Press, London, 1996, pp.157-183.

MacKenzie, Iain. ‘Power’ pp.69-87

Ashe, Fidelma. ‘The Subject’ pp.88-110.

Lloyd, Moya. ‘The Body’ pp.111-130.

- in Ashe and others (1999). Contemporary Social and Political Theory: An introduction. Buckingham: Open University Press.

The child's position is being regarded as the minority. Also the children and the state give some insight into this. Who has power and who is responsible. The power relations of government within society and the way certain institutions have the power and control over children. The way the laws are set up is another problem as adults become responsible for the actions of their children.

There is a (traditional) view of power that links it to position and/or resources, such as wealth, numbers, leadership, etc. This view suggests power is at the expense of the powerless (if I have it, you don't).

Another, more recent idea about power is that it is shifting between people in relationships. In families, for instance, patriarchy allocates power to men, but women can resist (traditionally by refusing sex). Or in more egalitarian families, perhaps, men can agree to share the housework but resist (eg washing woollen socks in hot water then drying them in the dryer).

Parents have authority over children, which gives them power. Children (as parents know) resist, which limits the power parents can exercise. Buckingham discusses this in the relaiton to television (who controls the remote!) (1994: 83-88). See his reference to 'the on-going guerilla warfare of family life' (p. 85).

How to Reference "Children Sociology Theorizing Childhood Power" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Children Sociology Theorizing Childhood Power.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2006, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/children-sociology-child-abuse/6082988. Accessed 3 Jul 2024.

Children Sociology Theorizing Childhood Power (2006). Retrieved from https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/children-sociology-child-abuse/6082988
A1-TermPaper.com. (2006). Children Sociology Theorizing Childhood Power. [online] Available at: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/children-sociology-child-abuse/6082988 [Accessed 3 Jul, 2024].
”Children Sociology Theorizing Childhood Power” 2006. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/children-sociology-child-abuse/6082988.
”Children Sociology Theorizing Childhood Power” A1-TermPaper.com, Last modified 2024. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/children-sociology-child-abuse/6082988.
[1] ”Children Sociology Theorizing Childhood Power”, A1-TermPaper.com, 2006. [Online]. Available: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/children-sociology-child-abuse/6082988. [Accessed: 3-Jul-2024].
1. Children Sociology Theorizing Childhood Power [Internet]. A1-TermPaper.com. 2006 [cited 3 July 2024]. Available from: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/children-sociology-child-abuse/6082988
1. Children Sociology Theorizing Childhood Power. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/children-sociology-child-abuse/6082988. Published 2006. Accessed July 3, 2024.

Related Term Papers:

Class and Identity Essay

Paper Icon

Identity

Class has been an enduring social concept used to explain the nature of inequalities within different societies. While there is disagreement within the different sociological paradigms as to the… read more

Essay 7 pages (2473 words) Sources: 14 Topic: Sociology / Society


Birth Order and Extraversion Introversion Term Paper

Paper Icon

BIRTH ORDER: EXTRAVERSION & INTROVERSION

Much study has been applied in the area of understanding that specific characteristics and genetic differences that may be assigned according to birth order of… read more

Term Paper 10 pages (3055 words) Sources: 25 Style: APA Topic: Child Development / Youth / Teens


Compare and Contrast Adolescents 16 19 to Senior Adults Over the Age 60 Term Paper

Paper Icon

Young adults have stronger, more flexible and enduring bodies that can perceive more sharply and process more information for quicker response even in a complicated environment than senior adults. These… read more

Term Paper 11 pages (3612 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Communication / Speech


Homelessness in the United States Term Paper

Paper Icon

Homelessness

IN the UNITED STATES and ITS INFLUENCE on CHILD DEVELOPMENT

People Without Homes

Points to Ponder

CONTRIBUTING CONSIDERATIONS

Snapshots of Homelessness

The Number of Homeless

Facts about homelessness in… read more

Term Paper 35 pages (10814 words) Sources: 12 Topic: Family / Dating / Marriage


Students With Disabilities Who Did Not Complete Dissertation

Paper Icon

Students With Disabilities Who Did Not Complete High School

Richard Wieringo

This case study explores the experiences of students with disabilities who have dropped out of high school, so as… read more

Dissertation 60 pages (17241 words) Sources: 0 Topic: Education / Teaching / Learning


Wed, Jul 3, 2024

If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!

Established in 1995
900,000 Orders Finished
100% Guaranteed Work
300 Words Per Page
Simple Ordering
100% Private & Secure

We can write a new, 100% unique paper!

Search Papers

Navigation

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!