Term Paper on "Capital Punishment in 1966 Kenneth Mcduff"

Term Paper 4 pages (1160 words) Sources: 0

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Capital Punishment

In 1966 Kenneth McDuff was convicted of shooting two boys, then raping and strangling their 16-year-old female companion. He was convicted to death. Unfortunately, in 1972 the Supreme Court's ruling against the death penalty commuted his sentence. In 1989, because of prison overflow, he was released. After all, it had been twenty-two years... Within days he had raped and strangled one young woman, leaving her naked body dumped in a field. He was temporarily reincarcerated over a traffic violation, and rereleased again in 1990. By 1991, he had begun killing again. No one knows how many victims he took, though at least nine are on record. He was eventually re-sentenced to death in one on the cases, the abduction, rape, and murder of a pregnant woman. He was finally put to sleep in 1998 through lethal injection. The story of McDuff and his victims speaks to me of the vital importance of the death penalty. Here we have a perfect example of the way in which relaxing the death penalty works in real life. For all the horror stories about innocent people killed by the state, the most important stories are about innocent people killed by repeat offenders. It is my belief that most serious criminals cannot be reformed or sufficiently contained for, as McDuff's case illustrates, the majority of them are both genetically and psychologically conditioned towards crime and violence in a way that the prison system only makes worse. Unless we are to force them to spend their entire lives in solitary confinement, which is so cruel as to be unconstitutional, there is no other legitimate option to keep them from killing again. Even true life in prison cannot stop them from killing or raping other in
Continue scrolling to

download full paper
mates who may not deserve such torture!

The argument regarding capital punishment is an emotional one, because both sides feel that they are arguing for justice and the greater good. Most abolitionist, who oppose the death penalty, believe that they are supporting the value of human life and that by opposing the death penalty they will create a better and more peaceful society. Most of those who support the death penalty, myself included, feel that it is the only way to create a better peaceful society. There seem to be three major arguments against the death penalty: that it devalues human life and thus encourages the same kind of mindset that provokes murder, or that it does not deter crime and is therefore just senseless killing, or that it is too expensive. For examples, in a speech to the National Law Day Panel, "Steven Hawkins, executive director of the National Coalition Against the Death Penalty, said capital punishment devalues human life." (Liebson) This argument functions by saying that if the state "murders" people that displease it, that this justifies the idea that individuals have a right to murder those who displease them, and justifies a culture of violence. The second argument is that the death penalty does not deter crime, and is therefore not valid. Former U.S. Attorney Janet Reno has been quoted as saying, "I have inquired for most of my adult life about studies that might show that the death penalty is a deterrent. And I have not seen any research that would substantiate that point." (NCADP) the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty further cites research which shows a correlation (if not necessarily causation) between legalized death penalties and high crime fatalities. The final argument compares… READ MORE

Quoted Instructions for "Capital Punishment in 1966 Kenneth Mcduff" Assignment:

Please note that the numbers by each section are only for organizational purposes. They should not be taken to represent paragraphs in your paper. You should spend adequate time with each of these sections as you see fit. I will be doing my paper on death penalty and I am for death penalty.

1. What is an interesting way to introduce your issue? You might use a quotation or a story that will pull readers in. if you use a quotation, choose one that helps make your overall point or that is provocative and pertinent to your issue. How you begin your essay greatly influences your ethos. Explain right away how you are entering into the ongoing conversation concerning your issue and why this issue is compelling to you. In other words explain where you are coming from and why.

2. Next, as you locate yourself in the conversation, explain what, precisely, others have claimed about the issue. Or, what are the prominent positions people have taken on your issue? Give an accurate, compressed, paraphrased summary; use direct quotations but use them sparingly in this section.

3. After introducing the conversation about your issue, you will then explain in detail how you agree and or disagree with those positions. Give your claim about your issue and explain how you differ from others’ positions and where you fit with them based on your circumstances (to build ethos). You might use the following transition sentences: “Hence, I will argue that...” or “based on the preceding discussion, I will suggest that…” or “extended [so and so’s] position, I add… and argue that…” etc. Remember that there are many ways to write a claim, depending on the type of claim you want to write. Make sure you fine-tune your claim after your paper is finished. Sometimes, claims change because the paper itself went “elsewhere.” Also, here is where you should mention the articles and authors that you agree with the most and will use for support throughout the rest of your essay.

4. Consider the value of your paper: what value will the audience get from reading your argument? Talk about your claim’s value right after you state your claim. You might say, “this is valuable because…” or “seeing this issue from a different point of view is crucial because…” or “extending [so and so’s] argument is important because…”

5. After you state your claim and the value your claim carries, you will spend the rest of your paper giving evidence and support for the claim. Remember this first part of the paper, while extremely crucial, should not exceed one third of the length of the paper. The bulk of your paper should be devoted to supporting your claim with evidence. What is the most powerful evidence that you have? Why? Did it persuade you by way of ethos, pathos, logos, or a combination of all three?

6. Where will you put your most powerful evidence? (This makes a difference.) How will you present it (story, graph, explication, visual explanation, etc)? How will you incorporate quotations into your essay?

7. Where will you put the rest of your evidence?

8. Where will you directly acknowledge the opposing view? How will you deal with possible refutation by your audience?

9. You will also need to acknowledge “what’s been left out?” of your discussion or what is involved in your issue that you chose not to discuss. This is crucial for building your ethos, especially if you are working with a complex issue. You might say something like: “I realize that my discussion is limited to…”

How to Reference "Capital Punishment in 1966 Kenneth Mcduff" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Capital Punishment in 1966 Kenneth Mcduff.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2004, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/capital-punishment-1966-kenneth/2442515. Accessed 3 Jul 2024.

Capital Punishment in 1966 Kenneth Mcduff (2004). Retrieved from https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/capital-punishment-1966-kenneth/2442515
A1-TermPaper.com. (2004). Capital Punishment in 1966 Kenneth Mcduff. [online] Available at: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/capital-punishment-1966-kenneth/2442515 [Accessed 3 Jul, 2024].
”Capital Punishment in 1966 Kenneth Mcduff” 2004. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/capital-punishment-1966-kenneth/2442515.
”Capital Punishment in 1966 Kenneth Mcduff” A1-TermPaper.com, Last modified 2024. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/capital-punishment-1966-kenneth/2442515.
[1] ”Capital Punishment in 1966 Kenneth Mcduff”, A1-TermPaper.com, 2004. [Online]. Available: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/capital-punishment-1966-kenneth/2442515. [Accessed: 3-Jul-2024].
1. Capital Punishment in 1966 Kenneth Mcduff [Internet]. A1-TermPaper.com. 2004 [cited 3 July 2024]. Available from: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/capital-punishment-1966-kenneth/2442515
1. Capital Punishment in 1966 Kenneth Mcduff. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/capital-punishment-1966-kenneth/2442515. Published 2004. Accessed July 3, 2024.

Related Term Papers:

Punishment Western Society Has Developed Essay

Paper Icon

Punishment

Western society has developed in such a way that today, rules and laws exist to ensure that every person in the free and democratic world can enjoy the rights… read more

Essay 6 pages (1952 words) Sources: 0 Topic: Crime / Police / Criminal Justice


Capital Expenditure Requests and Capital Budgeting Process Essay

Paper Icon

Capital Budgeting

Mission of CER and capital budgeting process

Stryker has enjoyed a strong run of growth, and has taken advantage of this to gradually de-leverage its balance sheet. As… read more

Essay 4 pages (1178 words) Sources: 4 Topic: Business / Corporations / E-commerce


Capital Gain Rates for Individuals Essay

Paper Icon

Capital Gain

The Revenue Reconciliation Act of 2010 (RRA 10) had really added an extra 2 higher tax brackets - 45% and 56.6% - for certain individuals, trusts and estates.… read more

Essay 8 pages (2401 words) Sources: 5 Topic: Economics / Finance / Banking


Capital Budgeting Case Research Proposal

Paper Icon

Capital Budgeting Case

The contemporaneous business community is characterized by numerous features of change, the sole constant being the extremely intense competition. This economic battle is fought at both national… read more

Research Proposal 8 pages (2182 words) Sources: 1+ Style: APA Topic: Economics / Finance / Banking


Proportionality of Punishment Term Paper

Paper Icon

punishment entails some standard of proportionality that calls for punishment to be impartial to the crime committed. Discussions of proportionality of punishment call for proportionality in the punishment and the… read more

Term Paper 3 pages (1110 words) Sources: 2 Topic: Crime / Police / Criminal Justice


Wed, Jul 3, 2024

If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!

Established in 1995
900,000 Orders Finished
100% Guaranteed Work
300 Words Per Page
Simple Ordering
100% Private & Secure

We can write a new, 100% unique paper!

Search Papers

Navigation

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!