Case Study on "Breast Cancer Screening"

Home > Topics > Disease & Injury My Account

Case Study 4 pages (1294 words) Sources: 4

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Breast Cancer Screening

What differences are there between the Case Study results and the current healthcare industry research, trends, treatment protocols, and published data results you identified?

The case study results show that overall sensitivity in women under age fifty was 78% and women with dense breast tissue had sensitivity at seventy percent for digital screenings and 51% and 55% for film screenings. Overall the sensitivity for digital screenings was at 70% and 66% for film screenings overall. According to this case only sixty-six percent of all women and fifty one percent of women under the age of fifty who have breast cancer will be identified by this screening test. The test correctly recognizes ninety percent of women under age fifty without breast cancer. With a specificity of ninety percent, ten percent of those without breast cancer will be false positives.

Today, sensitivity is just about seventy-nine percent but is lesser in younger women and in those with dense breast tissue. In general specificity is about ninety percent and is lesser in younger women and in those with dense breasts (Breast Cancer Screening Modalities, n.d.). Sensitivity for Clinical Breast Exam (CBE) has been reported to range from forty to sixty-nine percent, and its specificity ranges from eighty-eight to ninety-nine percent. Trials in which CBE is combined with mammography have established a mortality reduction of fourteen to twenty-nine percent. Like BSE, the sensitivity and value of CBE is related, in fraction, to the skill of the healthcare provider doing the examination. When CBE is done prior to mammography, it may be useful in recognizing an area of doub

Continue scrolling to

download full paper ⤓

t that might not be readily visible on mammography or provide guidance in selecting supplementary imaging techniques (Breast Cancer Screening, 2006).

2. Are the Breast Cancer Screening patient outcomes between the Case Study data results and the current data results that you identified better or worse? Explain.

The results of current patient outcomes appear to be better than those that were reported in the case study. This is due to the fact that the mammography test has improved over the years. Mammography persists to advance and offers facilities an assortment of alternatives when conducting mammography screening and diagnostic services. One of the most basic transformations in radiology has been an alteration from screen-film to digital image attainment, and clinical investigation in recent years has centered on the corroboration of digital studies in mammography and other imaging applications. There are relative compensations and weaknesses to both screen-film and digital studies, and facilities should consider these cautiously when making the choice to keep a screen-film system or changeover to digital image acquisition (Barke, n.d.)

In addition to the superior diagnostic value in women who are under the age of fifty, those with dense breasts, and pre-menopausal women, digital mammography could present supplementary advantages. For example, digital imaging permits for streamlined, electronic image sharing and archiving capabilities. Dissimilar from screen-film images, the reader can without difficulty manipulate digital images to assist in results reading. Digital mammography also provides for enhanced visualization in people with breast implants, and enhanced contrast resolution can be realized with digital mammography in opposition to screen-film mammography. On average, digital mammography exposes people to a lower radiation dose than screen-film modalities. Even though digital mammography symbolizes a significant advance in breast imaging, screen-film mammography is still a feasible modality that is more cost effective for facilities that do not have the capital to right away transition to a digital platform. The option between screen-film and digital mammography is a significant choice for many facilities, but there are other modalities that are now being included into the typical breast cancer screening algorithm and deserve better concentration in some people at an augmented risk of developing the illness (Barke, n.d.)

3. From your research and analysis of the Breast Cancer Screening process, does the data demonstrate a favorable or unfavorable… READ MORE

Download Full Paper

Write a New Paper for Me

Quoted Instructions for "Breast Cancer Screening" Assignment:

“

Assignment #1 ***** *****Breast Cancer Screening***** Case Study ***** Chapter 3

As the Manager of Epidemiology, research to find *****current***** healthcare industry data on *****Breast Cancer Screening***** trends, treatments, and protocols. Using the data you found, answer the four (4) Questions in the *****Breast Cancer Screening***** Case Study ***** Chapter 3.

Evaluate, compare, and contrast the *****current***** data you researched with the answers and results provided in the *****Breast Cancer Screening***** Case Study ***** Chapter 3,

Prepare a four to six page report that answers the following questions:

1. What differences are there between the Case Study results and the current healthcare industry research, trends, treatment protocols, and published data results you identified?

2. Are the Breast Cancer Screening patient outcomes between the Case Study data results and the current data results that you identified better or worse? Explain.

3. From your research and analysis of the Breast Cancer Screening process, does the data demonstrate a favorable or unfavorable link between Breast Cancer Screening detection performed before disease symptoms have manifested in the patient, as opposed to diagnostic testing that takes place after disease symptoms have manifested in the patient?

The format of the report is to be as follows: o Typed, double spaced, Times New Roman font (size 12), one inch margins on all

sides, APA format. o Type the question followed by your answer to the question. o In addition to the 4-6 pages required, a title page is to be included. The title page

is to contain the title of the assignment, your name, the instructor*****s name, the course title, and the date.

NOTE: You will be graded on the quality of your answers, the logic/organization of the report, your language skills, and your writing skills.

The assignment will be graded using the following rubric:

Outcomes Assessed

ï‚· Assess the quality of care through community health planning and needs assessment tools.

ï‚· Use technology and information resources to research issues in managerial epidemiology.

Grading Rubric for Assignment #1 - *****Breast Cancer Screening*****

Criteria

0 Unacceptable

20 Developing

30 Competent

40 Exemplary

1. What differences are there between the Case Study results and the current healthcare industry research, trends, treatment protocols and published data results you identified?

Did not complete or did not describe sufficiently the differences between the Case Study results and the current healthcare industry research, trends, treatment protocols, and published data identified; or included irrelevant information.

Described the differences between the Case Study results and the current healthcare industry research, trends, treatment protocols, and published data identified with 70 ***** 79% accuracy, insight, and thoroughness.

Described the differences between the Case Study results and the current healthcare industry research, trends, treatment protocols, and published data identified with 80 ***** 89% accuracy, insight, and thoroughness.

Described the differences between the Case Study results and the current healthcare industry research, trends, treatment protocols, and published data identified with 90 ***** 100 % accuracy, insight, and thoroughness.

2. Are the Breast Cancer Screening patient outcomes between the Case

Did not complete the assignment or did not explain views sufficiently about

Explained views about Breast Cancer Screening patient outcomes with 70 *****

Explained views about Breast Cancer Screening patient outcomes with 80 *****

Explained views about Breast Cancer Screening patient outcomes with 90 *****

Criteria

0 Unacceptable

20 Developing

30 Competent

40 Exemplary

Study data results and the current data results that you identified better or worse? Explain.

Breast Cancer Screening patient outcomes; or included irrelevant information.

79% accuracy, insight, and thoroughness.

89% accuracy, insight, and thoroughness.

100 % accuracy, insight, and thoroughness.

3. From your research and analysis of the Breast Cancer Screening process, does the data demonstrate a favorable or unfavorable link between Breast Cancer Screening detection performed before disease symptoms have manifested in the patient, as opposed to diagnostic testing that takes place after disease symptoms have manifested in the patient?

Did not complete the assignment or did not answer sufficiently; or, included irrelevant information.

Provided a partial answer based on analysis of Breast Cancer Screening process before disease manifestation of disease symptoms contrasted with diagnostic testing after manifestation of disease symptoms. Discussed with 70 ***** 79% accuracy, insight, and logic.

Provided a sufficient answer based on analysis of Breast Cancer Screening process before disease manifestation of disease symptoms contrasted with diagnostic testing after manifestation of disease symptoms. Discussed with 80 ***** 89% accuracy, insight, and logic.

Provided a thorough answer based on analysis of Breast Cancer Screening process before disease manifestation of disease symptoms contrasted with diagnostic testing after manifestation of disease symptoms. Discussed with 90 ***** 100 % accuracy, insight, and logic.

4. Clarity

Did not complete the assignment or explanations are unclear and not organized.

(Major issues)

Explanations generally unclear and not well organized. (Many issues)

Explanations generally clear and/or organized. (Minor issues)

Explanations very clear and well organized. (Added helpful details)

5. Writing ***** Grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or APA usage.

Did not complete the assignment or had 8 or more different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation or APA usage. (Major issues)

Had 6 - 7 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation or APA usage. (Many issues)

Had 4 - 5 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation or APA usage. (Minor issues)

Had 0 - 3 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation or APA usage. *****

How to Reference "Breast Cancer Screening" Case Study in a Bibliography

“Breast Cancer Screening.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2011, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/breast-cancer-screening-differences/481196. Accessed 6 Jul 2024.

Breast Cancer Screening (2011). Retrieved from https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/breast-cancer-screening-differences/481196

A1-TermPaper.com. (2011). Breast Cancer Screening. [online] Available at: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/breast-cancer-screening-differences/481196 [Accessed 6 Jul, 2024].

”Breast Cancer Screening” 2011. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/breast-cancer-screening-differences/481196.

”Breast Cancer Screening” A1-TermPaper.com, Last modified 2024. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/breast-cancer-screening-differences/481196.

[1] ”Breast Cancer Screening”, A1-TermPaper.com, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/breast-cancer-screening-differences/481196. [Accessed: 6-Jul-2024].

1. Breast Cancer Screening [Internet]. A1-TermPaper.com. 2011 [cited 6 July 2024]. Available from: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/breast-cancer-screening-differences/481196

1. Breast Cancer Screening. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/breast-cancer-screening-differences/481196. Published 2011. Accessed July 6, 2024.