Case Study on "Australian Corporations Law Director's Duties"
Case Study 4 pages (1137 words) Sources: 4
[EXCERPT] . . . .
AUS Corp LawHP Case Qs
Assuming the facts of this case as presented are true and that there was no deception on the part of any party mentioned in the case, the breach in this case is limited to one individual and one specific decision/action (or inaction). Of Hampton Park Ltd.'s four directors, only William appears to be in a position that would normally be expected to have relevant and up-to-date information regarding the company's financial position and decisions (Gail is mentioned but not described, so it can be assumed that her role is as limited as Jack and Susan's), and while this does not in and of itself limit the liability and the responsibility of the non-managing board members it does, in the given set of circumstances, limit their liability and thus the consequences of any breach and even makes the existence of a breach of duty questionable. Even William, as will be shown, could make a plausible case that he did not breach in his own duty and an even stronger case that liability for any breach in regards to the actions described in the case does not attach. Instead, the breach and any resultant liability fall solely on the shoulders of non-director but chief financial officer George, who failed to remain informed regarding changes to dividend calculation and who failed to inform the board of relevant information in a timely manner.
Though board directors are tasked with the responsibility of making inquiries with relevant officers and employees and taking steps in ensuring the accuracy and rectitude of the information and actions taken, they are also explicitly freed from liability by their right to rely on others.
T
download full paper ⤓
HP chief financial officer George is unquestionably an employee that matches this description; again assuming all representations made by individuals in the case were made in good faith and were honest/accurate, then George is an experienced financial officer who is quite competent in determining appropriate courses of action and to unquestionably had access to reliable information in regards to the decision(s) under question in this case. His assurance that the paid dividends were reasonably established under profit reportable under the Australian Corporations Act Section 254t had no reasonable reason to be doubted even if the company's financial situation as a whole was deteriorating. The only instance of any wrongdoing and potential breach, in fact, appears to be George's failure to inform the board of changes to the accounting/financial constraints and requirements for the payment of dividends. Again, assuming that the dividends would have been legally payable under the original Australian Corporations Act of 2001, as is indicated by the facts of the case as given, the board would have no reason to question George's information or assessment of the company's dividend-paying capabilities. George's failure to remain informed rests squarely with him.
Section 254t of the Australian Corporations Act of 2001 states that dividends may be paid so long as they do not "materially prejudice the company's ability to pay its creditors," and Section 588g of the same Act states that dividends are considered debts incurred at the time the dividend payment is made or declared, provided the company's constitution allows for such declarations. Though the company's liquidation occurred shortly after the declaration of the dividends, it… READ MORE
Quoted Instructions for "Australian Corporations Law Director's Duties" Assignment:
I need to answer the 3 "REQUIRED TO ANSWER" questions about the next case regarding Australian Corporations Law, more specific: Duties of Directors. I'll send scanned the relevant chapters of the prescribed textbook but I need references to some of the other books I'm writing down as well. The Citation Style I need is the Australian Legal Citation one, I am writing down a link which takes you to the Guide for this Citation Style.
Case Study
Hampton Park Pty Ltd (HP) has four directors: William, Jack, Susan and Gail. William is the managing director of the company while Susan and Jack are non executive directors of the company. Susan is an experienced business woman with other business interests and she is not involved in the running of the company. She leaves the running of the company to William and relies on him. She believes that if there is any problem in the company William will let her know. Jack is also an experienced businessman who sits on a number of other company boards. Jack was asked to sit on HP's board for his financial knowledge and experience but William had assured him that the company*****s Chief Financial Officer was one of the best and his role on the Board was to lend financial credibility to the company. Based on William's assurances Jack did not involve himself directly in the running of the company or the oversight of its financial position.
George is (HP's) chief Financial Officer. In July 2009, while the company's financial position is showing signs of deterioration, George advises that the accounts show a profit and HP would have a solid basis for paying a dividend. In July 2010, the company's financial position worsens. Despite being fully aware of the company's deteriorating financial position, George informs William and the Board that the HP has made a technical profit under s 254T of the Corporations Act 2001, and HP could declare a dividend.
Unbeknown to George the basis for declaring the dividend was altered in late June 2010 with the introduction of a different test for the declaration of dividends. George had become aware of the change in the law in September 2010 but he failed to inform the Board of HP before the Board signed off on the 2010 financial reports. In September of 2010 the Board signs off on the company's 2010 financial statements.
As a result of this favourable advice given to the Board by George, the board of directors decides to declare a dividend to members. Susan was absent from the meeting. Shortly after the dividend was paid the company went into liquidation.
REQUIRED TO ANSWER:
a) Advise whether there have been any breaches of the directors and officers duty of care under the Corporations Act and the consequences or penalties of any such breaches.
b) Also advise whether there have been any breach of directors duties in relation to insolvent trading.
c) Finally, advise whether any defences are available to the directors and what penalties may be imposed upon them if they are found to have breached the insolvent trading provisions under the Corporations Act 2001.
(Part a) 12 marks and Parts b) and c) 18 marks. Total of 30 marks)
SUGGESTED REFERENCES:
Lipton, P., and Herzberg, A., Welsh, M, Understanding Company Law, 16 edition Thomson Reuters 2012.
Students should remember to look at the Lipton and Herzberg website. www.lipton-herzberg.com.au
Harris, J. Hargovan, A. Adams, M. Australian Corporate Law LexisNexis Butterworths 4th edition, 2013.
Austin R.P. & Ramsay, I., Ford's Principles of Corporations Law, Butterworths, Australia, 15th edition, 2012.
Baxt, R., and Fletcher, K.L., Fridman, S., Corporations and Associations Cases and Materials on, Butterworths, Australia, 10th edition, 2008.
Parker, Clarke, Veljanovski, Posthouwer, Corporate Law, Palgrave 1st edition 2012
Hanrahan, P., Ramsay I., Stapledon G., Commercial Applications of Company Law. CCH 14th edition 2013
Redmond, P., Companies and Securities Law - Commentary and Materials, Law Book Co., Sydney, 5th, 2009.
Ciro T, Symes C, Corporations Law in Principle LBC Thomson Reuters, Sydney, 9th edition 2013
Li, G, Riley, S. Applied Corporate Law: A Bilingual Approach LexisNexis 1st Edition 2009.
Cassidy, J. Corporations Law Text and Essential Cases. Federation Press, 3rd edition Sydney 2010
Harris, J. Corporations Law, LexisNexis Study Guide 1st edition 2008
Harris, J. Butterworths Questions and Answers Corporations Law:, LexisNexis, 3rd Edition Sydney 2009.
Fisher S, Anderson C, Dickfos, Corporations Law - Butterworths Tutorial Series, 3rd Edition Butterworths, Sydney 2009
Tomasic,R.,Jackson,J.,Woellner,R., Corporations Law - Principles, Policy and Process 4th Edition Butterworths., Sydney, 2002.
Tomasic, R. Bottomley,S. McQueen,R. Corporations Law in Australia, 2nd Edition Federation Press, Sydney 2002.
Latimer, P, Australian Business Law CC, 2013 Edition.
Vermeesch,R B, Lindgren, K E, Business Law of Australia Butterworths, 12th Edition, 2011.
Pentony, Graw, Lennard & Parker, Understanding Business Law 5th ed Butterworths, 2013.
Davenport, S and Parker D, Business and Law in Australia, Thomson Reuters, 2012
Fitzpatrick, Synes, Veljanovski, Parker, Business and Corporations Law; LexisNexis 1st edition 2011
Crosling G M, Murphy H M, How to Study Business Law 4th Edition, Butterworths, 2009.
*****¢ See chapter 13.4 and 13.5 in Lipton,Herzberg & Welsh 16th Edition
Referencing
In law, the preferred referencing style is footnoting. Students are reminded that they will lose marks if they merely reproduce passages copied word for word from texts and other references without attempting to convey information and express ideas in their own words. Of course this does not preclude the intelligent use of relevant quotations in respect of which proper references are given.
It should be noted that the references must be given in respect of all material included in the essay. References are not to be confined to situations in which the ***** is citing a particular case or using a direct quotation. For example, if the ***** is putting forward a legal proposition or using a statement or idea drawn from a specific source, that source must be acknowledged by reference. It is essential that references be properly acknowledged at all times and marks will be deducted if this is not done. References may be acknowledged by numbering them consecutively throughout the essay and by giving details of the references by way of numbered footnotes at the bottom of the relevant page, or by way of a list at the end of the essay. Note carefully that the edition and page numbers of references must be given: it is not sufficient to merely give the name and author of the work. When referring to cases, the full case citation must be given. In addition, a bibliography should always be included at the end of the essay. Students should contact the lecturer if they are in any doubt as to the requirements for the giving of references.
Referencing: Footnotes or end-notes must be used to acknowledge the source or sources of information contained in the assignment. Footnotes are preferred, but either will be accepted. In regard to the acknowledgment of references and matters of style and presentation, students are referred to:
1. Australian Guide to Legal Citation ��" VU Library Homepage. For all referencing questions for your assignment or any legal writing See: Australian Guide to Legal Citation: The VU Library has a 4 page edited version under Information for researchers: Click on Information for researchers and then click on Referencing and then click on Style Manuals. A copy of the Australian Guide to Legal citation is also available on Webct.
See: http://w2.vu.edu.au/library/referencing/files/AGLC2.pdf
Also see Monash Legal Abbreviations for abbreviations of legal publications.
See: http://www.lib.monash.edu.au/legal-abbreviations
2. G.R.E. Phillips and L.H. Hunt, Writing Essays and Dissertations,
3. G Campbell, The Little Black Book. (available in the bookshop).
Students are required to pay careful attention to spelling, expression, and legibility in the writing of their essays.
*****
How to Reference "Australian Corporations Law Director's Duties" Case Study in a Bibliography
“Australian Corporations Law Director's Duties.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2013, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/aus-corp-law-hp-case/7006163. Accessed 3 Jul 2024.
Related Papers:
Comparative Corporate Law Term Paper
![Paper Icon](https://www.a1-termpaper.com/images/term-paper-3.png)
standard of conduct and standard of review in Corporate Law
This study concerns the duty of care in American corporate law vs. The duty of care in Australian corporate law.… read more
Term Paper 14 pages (3809 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Business / Corporations / E-commerce
Legislation (B) Roman Code (C) Common Law Assessment
![Paper Icon](https://www.a1-termpaper.com/images/term-paper-3.png)
Legislation
(b) Roman Code
(c) Common Law
(d) None of the Above
(2) a General Principle of Liability is defined as:
(a) a Breach of Fiduciary Duty
(b) Tortious Interference… read more
Assessment 9 pages (2454 words) Sources: 0 Topic: Law / Legal / Jurisprudence
Corporate Manslaughter in the UK Term Paper
![Paper Icon](https://www.a1-termpaper.com/images/term-paper-3.png)
Corporate Manslaughter Bill
Research Organisation
Critical Analysis
The Evolutionary Process
The Legal Context
The Debate: Law or Social Ethics?
Exploratory
Descriptive
Explanatory
Quantitative vs. Qualitative
Deductive vs. Inductive
Data Sources… read more
Term Paper 45 pages (12324 words) Sources: 60 Topic: Law / Legal / Jurisprudence
Corporate Governance in Australia Term Paper
![Paper Icon](https://www.a1-termpaper.com/images/term-paper-3.png)
Corporate Governance in Australia
Australia Corporate Responsibility and Corporate Governance
The proper governance of companies will become as crucial to the world economy as the proper governing of countries... strong… read more
Term Paper 14 pages (4378 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Business / Corporations / E-commerce
Streeter V Western Areas Exploration Pty Essay
![Paper Icon](https://www.a1-termpaper.com/images/term-paper-3.png)
Streeter v Western Areas Exploration Pty
The general company laws and earlier judgments have all concurred and pointed out the results reached in the Streeter case. The case has a… read more
Essay 6 pages (2635 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Business / Corporations / E-commerce
Wed, Jul 3, 2024
If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!
We can write a new, 100% unique paper!