Essay on "Supreme Court Decisions Constitution"

Home  >  Topics  >  Law My Account

Essay 4 pages (1386 words) Sources: 0

[EXCERPT] . . . .

1946, Heman Sweatt, an intelligent and well qualified African-American man, at the behest of the National Association of Colored Peoples (NAACP), applied for admission to the University of Texas School of Law. In so doing, however, he ran squarely into the lingering effects of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896). There, the Court established the "Separate but Equal" Doctrine, opining that "the [Equal Protection Clause of the] Fourteenth Amendment & #8230;could not have been intended to abolish distinctions based upon color, or to enforce social…equality. Laws permitting, and even requiring, their separation in places where they are liable to be brought into contact do not necessarily imply the inferiority of either race to the other, and have been generally, if not universally, recognized as within the competency of the state legislatures" (Id. At 544).

One of the states to which the Supreme Court referred, of course, was Texas. for, under Article VII, Section 7 of the contemporaneous version of the Constitution of the State of Texas, "[s]eparate schools [were to] be provided for the white and colored children, and impartial provision…made for both (Tex. Const. art. 7, § 7, 1876). Although Mr. Sweat, admittedly, fulfilled every requisite qualification for admission to the school, his application was denied solely on the basis of that state constitutional provision Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629, 631 (1950).

In response, the NAACP, under the guidance of future Supreme Court Justice, Thurgood Marshall, brought suit in state court on behalf of Mr. Sweatt, alleging that, since no comparable law school existed within t
Continue scrolling to

download full paper
he State of Texas for African-American students, Mr. Sweatt could not be denied admission, but rather must be admitted to the University (Id.). On first impression, the trial court judge, while recognizing that denying the plaintiff the opportunity to gain a legal education, while granting it to others, deprived him of the equal protection of the laws, as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment, nevertheless, continued the case for six months to provide the State, and University of Texas President, Theophilus S. Painter, an opportunity to satisfy the mandates of the Plessy decision (Id. At 631- 632). The University took advantage of the opportunity thus afforded and quickly adopted an order providing for the establishment of a law school for African-American students (Id.). Although this school was not functional at the end of the original six-month continuance, the trial court found sufficient the State's intent and ruled in favor of the defendants (Id.).

As Mr. Sweatt, and the NAACP, planned their appeal in state appellate court, the University set about creating its parallel institution for African-American students.

The resulting, interim " law school, to be named the School of Law of the Texas State University for Negroes, was to be located in the basement of a state office building in Austin, and open early in 1947, with no independent faculty or library (Id. At 633).

Mr. Sweatt refused to enroll (Id.).

The Texas Court of Civil Appeals set aside the trial court's judgment and remanded the case back to the trial court, where a hearing was held on the issue of whether the educational facilities at the newly established school were substantially equal to those of the University of Texas Law School (Id. At 632). This would continue to be the salient issue for the remainder of the case. At the conclusion of this hearing, the trial court held that the upstart school did, indeed, offer Mr. Sweatt "privileges, advantages, and opportunities for the study of law substantially equivalent to those offered by the State to white students at the University of Texas;" and the Texas Court of Civil Appeals affirmed in Sweatt v. Painter, 210 S.W.2d 442 (1948).

On appeal to the United States Supreme Court, Mr. Sweatt, and the NAACP, squarely presented, and convincingly argued, that the new facility set up by the state was, in no way, the equal of the University of Texas School of Law, and represented little more than a desperate attempt at appeasement (Sweatt, 339 U.S. 629, 632-634, 1950). The State, meanwhile, maintained that the separate but equal mandates of Plessy… READ MORE

Quoted Instructions for "Supreme Court Decisions Constitution" Assignment:

Present a report on a Supreme Court decision that has been important in shaping the interpretation of the Constitution. The report should be four- to five-pages in length (excluding cover page, reference page, etc.). The choice of the court decision is up to you. A list of suitable cases can be found in the Appendix of this guide. You may organize your report as you see fit, however, the report should, at a minimum cover the following points: the background of the case (the parties and the points at issue), the constitutional questions raised by the case, a clear summary of the court*****s decision, and an evaluation of the decision*****s constitutional significance (the relationship of this decision to others is relevant here). The report should be prepared using APA style. All sources must be cited.

You are welcome to use whatever sources you feel to be appropriate. Some websites that may help with your paper include:

a. The texts of Supreme Court decisions since 1893 may be found at www.Findlaw.com/casecode/supreme.html.

b. Oyez-Oyez-Oyez is a comprehensive database of major constitutional cases. http://www.oyez.org/

c. Rominger Legal Services provides U.S. Supreme Court links including history, pending cases, rules, bios, etc. http://www.romingerlegal.com/supreme.htm

Appendix: Supreme Court Cases

Constitutional Evolution

Chisholm v. Georgia (1793)

Ware v. Hylton (1796)

Marshall Court, I

Fletcher v. Peck (1810)

***** v. Hunter*****s Lessee (1816)

Marshall Court, II

Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831)

Worcester v. Georgia (1832)

Barron v. Baltimore (1833)

Taney Court

Bank of August v. Earle (1839)

Prigg v. Pennsylvania (1842)

Luther v. Burden (1849)

Strader v. Graham (1851)

Civil War, II

Ex parte Merryman (1861)

Prize Cases (1863)

Reconstruction

Ex parte McCardle (1869)

Texas v. White (1869)

Retreat from Reconstruction

Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock (1903)

Slaughterhouse Cases (1873)

Minor v. Happersett (1875)

Virginia v. Rives (1880)

Ex parte Yarborough (1884)

Industrialization

Wabash R. R. v. Illinois (1886)

In re Debs (1895)

Pollock v. Farmer*****s Loan & Trust (1895)

Progressivism

Lochner v. New York (1906)

Standard Oil v. U.S. (1911)

Beginnings of Modern Civil Liberties

Abrams v. U.S. (1919)

Schenck v. U.S. (1919)

Gitlow v. New York (1925)

Korematsu v. U.S. (1944)

New Deal and Constitutional Crisis

NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel (1937)

U.S. v. Darby Lumber Co. (1941)

Yakus v. U.S. (1944)

The Supreme Court and Modern Politics

Baker v. Carr (1962)

Reynolds v. Sims (1964)

Wesberry v. Sanders (1964)

Bush v. Gore (2000)

Civil Rights

Smith v. Allwright (1944)

Shelly v. Kraemer (1948)

Sweatt v. Painter (1950)

Milliken v. Bradley (1974)

Regents v. Bakke (1978)

Adarand Construction Co. v. Pena (1995)

Michigan Cases (2003)

Due Process

Palko v. Connecticut (1937)

Mapp v. Ohio (1961)

Miranda v. Arizona (1966)

Furman v. Georgia (1972)

Gregg v. Georgia (1976)

Civil Liberties

Engel v. Vitale (1962)

New York Times v. Sullivan (1964)

Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)

New York Times v. U.S. (1971)

Texas v. Johnson (1989)

Gender and the Constitution

Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)

Reed v. Reed (1971)

***** v. Boren (1976)

Grove City College v. Bell (1984)

Bowers v. Hardwick (1986)

Webster v. Reproductive services (1989)

Lawrence v. Texas (2003)

Separation of Powers

Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952)

U.S. v. Nixon (1974)

INS v. Chadha (1983)

***** v. City of New York (1998)

How to Reference "Supreme Court Decisions Constitution" Essay in a Bibliography

Supreme Court Decisions Constitution.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2010, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/1946-heman-sweatt-intelligent/4421311. Accessed 6 Jul 2024.

Supreme Court Decisions Constitution (2010). Retrieved from https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/1946-heman-sweatt-intelligent/4421311
A1-TermPaper.com. (2010). Supreme Court Decisions Constitution. [online] Available at: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/1946-heman-sweatt-intelligent/4421311 [Accessed 6 Jul, 2024].
”Supreme Court Decisions Constitution” 2010. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/1946-heman-sweatt-intelligent/4421311.
”Supreme Court Decisions Constitution” A1-TermPaper.com, Last modified 2024. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/1946-heman-sweatt-intelligent/4421311.
[1] ”Supreme Court Decisions Constitution”, A1-TermPaper.com, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/1946-heman-sweatt-intelligent/4421311. [Accessed: 6-Jul-2024].
1. Supreme Court Decisions Constitution [Internet]. A1-TermPaper.com. 2010 [cited 6 July 2024]. Available from: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/1946-heman-sweatt-intelligent/4421311
1. Supreme Court Decisions Constitution. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/1946-heman-sweatt-intelligent/4421311. Published 2010. Accessed July 6, 2024.

Related Essays:

Supreme Court Case Coker v. Georgia Research Paper

Paper Icon

Supreme Court Case:

According to the United States Constitution, any state legislature or Congress may prescribe capital punishment or the death penalty for capital offenses or murder. This is especially… read more

Research Paper 3 pages (1051 words) Sources: 6 Topic: Crime / Police / Criminal Justice


Effects of Supreme Court Decisions Essay

Paper Icon

Supreme Court Decisions

The Nature and Purpose of Counseling

Effects of Supreme Court Decisions

Effects of Supreme Court Decisions

The major tenets of criminal procedure are widely known and accepted… read more

Essay 7 pages (2427 words) Sources: 6 Topic: Crime / Police / Criminal Justice


Supreme Court in Many Respects, the Justice Research Paper

Paper Icon

Supreme Court

In many respects, the justice behind the Supreme Court decisions is nearly as important as the decisions themselves. It is said that no one knows how a justice… read more

Research Paper 3 pages (1125 words) Sources: 3 Topic: Abortion / Pro-Life / Pro-Choice


Supreme Court Cases Case Briefs for Five Term Paper

Paper Icon

Supreme Court Cases

Case Briefs for Five (5) Supreme Court Cases

Case

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) (Brown I)

Argued: December 9-11, 1952

Reargued: December 7-9,… read more

Term Paper 5 pages (2082 words) Sources: 5 Topic: Education / Teaching / Learning


Panetti v. Quarterman Supreme Court Case Term Paper

Paper Icon

United States Supreme Court Decision Brief

SCOTT LOUIS PANETTI, Petitioner-Appellant, versus DOUG DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT of CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

PRIOR HISTORY: Appeal… read more

Term Paper 6 pages (2079 words) Sources: 3 Topic: Law / Legal / Jurisprudence


Sat, Jul 6, 2024

If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!

Established in 1995
900,000 Orders Finished
100% Guaranteed Work
300 Words Per Page
Simple Ordering
100% Private & Secure

We can write a new, 100% unique paper!

Search Papers

Navigation

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!